Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The way one perceives art depends on person to person, and it is highly subjective. In today’s time, with the advent of the digital revolution, there is more digital content than ever, and artists can promote their art using various social media platforms and earn money through it. So there is no necessary need for the government to fund art, for it being available to masses. However, the government funds can be more wisely used for promoting art, say, music, painting, writing, acting, etc., for young people to pursue such a profession by giving them scholarship or stipend and making more art institutions, museums, etc. So there is no particular position of whether government funding is necessary for arts to flourish and available to all people, or the funding threatens the integrity of the arts. However, I believe that if funding is utilized in an effective way, it will definitely help and motivate the artists to make and sell their arts.
The most important aspect of art is its appeal to the audience. The appeal depends on the quality of the art to a large extent, and making a good quality art takes time. And if government funds such arts, they might be interested in the financial aspect of the art, and there may be deadlines which ultimately pressure the artist to make the art quicker and thus compromising the quality. And in that way, the government funding threatens the integrity of the art. But if government funds are utilized in promoting the existing classical arts to young generations, it will help them know their culture well and connects to their roots.
So, in conclusion, the government funds should be utilized in an effective sense, and there should be no strings attached that may force the artists to compromise the quality of the art.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 47
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 861, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., I believe that if funding is utilized in an effective way, it will definitely help and motivate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90131578947 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66569172939 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496710526316 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3415256517 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481430949503 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207703523599 0.0831039109588 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128298894169 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320622109063 0.150359130593 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100829978177 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.