Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
The author of this statement claims the many of important discoveries and creations are accidentally. As far as I am concerned, this assertion was true in the past, while in the modern age most discoveries are gained by logical procedures.
First at all, scientist and researchers use the trail and errors in the past. Therefore, it is quite normal they have faced many unpredictable results, which may were important than what they wanted to find. I think that a small example can give some light to this matter. When Henry Becquerel, who was a famous chemist, work on phosphorescence activities on certain materials, he found that some of them can emission light without exposure on the sun. Hence, he concluded that some materials have special properties that he called radioactivity. Therefore, he accidentally found a great discovery, which led him to gain the Nobel Prize.
In contrast, nowadays, the scenario is more different than what was previously, and researchers have to use scientific approaches for discovery new things in the most cases. In fact, the trail and error is costly and time consuming. As we all know, in the university students learn that before starting any experiment, they should spend much time for collecting data. In this way, it is apparent their results of finding will base on the measurement approaches, not accidental. I think that there is not a better example than radioactive experiments. Scientist measure many chemical reactions with mathematics, and simulate them in the computers before they start their experiments. Indeed, they can predict a great percentage of the results in the research level, and they rarely face with unforeseen results.
Finally, discoveries do not have root in chances as far as they are the production of a discerning mind. Even those discoveries and inventions which were accidental, stand for the argument to show the aptitude of the person to catch that idea. Apple has been falling from trees in every corner of the world. If it was an accident, why anyone else besides Newton did not think of the gravity? The years of preparations put individuals on the brink of finding something new. This is because the mind of an observer is flexible and apt to grasp the results whether it was the intended results or not.
In sum, it is acceptable many of discoveries in the past base on accidental events. However, modern scientists always use the scientific procedure, which decreases the possibility of unpredictable results, for their experiments.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
2023-01-06 | wwwqaq111 | 83 | view |
- TOEFL T P O 20 Integrated Writing Task 78
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 76
- Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Do you agree or disagree and give reasons and examples 70
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 94
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...owadays, the scenario is more different than what was previously, and researchers ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'measures'.
Suggestion: measures
...than radioactive experiments. Scientist measure many chemical reactions with mathematic...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'i think', 'in contrast', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225321888412 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.141630901288 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0922746781116 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536480686695 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0557939914163 0.0444667217837 125% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.135193133047 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.019313304721 0.0406280797675 48% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.95437388433 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0150214592275 0.030933414821 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111587982833 0.0997080785238 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128755364807 0.0249443105267 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.019313304721 0.0148568991511 130% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2529.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 414.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10869565217 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335748792271 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270531400966 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217391304348 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.166666666667 0.132149295362 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95437388433 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 219.290929204 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 65.6663366497 55.4138127331 119% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6708744805 59.4972553346 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.956521739 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.674092028746 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 45.0531400966 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.51282051282 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306024254957 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0955972875786 0.123202303941 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0538190237781 0.077325440228 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498199809365 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131109140273 0.149214159877 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112904046312 0.161403998019 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601091195109 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.34236815207 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.110794387973 0.0692045440612 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207857596655 0.275328986314 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348339068127 0.0653680567796 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.