The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts illustrate the percentage of students at one English university who could communicate in other languages aside for English, in 2000 and 2010.
Generally, it is clear that British students were mostly monolinguals and among the options mentioned, French was the increasingly popular language among students while the opposite is true for Spanish.
As seen throughout the survey, the percentage of monolingual students occupied the top spot in both 2000 and 2010 (30 and 35 percent, respectively). While the figures for French speakers and trilingual both rose by 5 percent (15 percent to 20 percent and 10 percent to 15 percent, respectively), the statistics for an unspecified language and Spanish speakers both declined, with the later halving its starting figure to 10 percent at the end of the survey. The most striking feature however, was the percentage of Germany speakers, which remained at 10% in both years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Should computers and tablets completely replace books in schools and universities?Write an essay giving your opinion. 95
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- Take a look at the graphics and complete the task.The table and chart show data about reading among people under 30 years old.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend abou 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, which remained at 10% in both years.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234939759036 0.268076937826 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.0903614457831 0.116061578633 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0903614457831 0.0759168565197 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0481927710843 0.0366838410393 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0120481927711 0.0131127313244 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144578313253 0.155750635184 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0240963855422 0.0379272487307 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91661904723 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0180722891566 0.0210936926555 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.120481927711 0.0948980150116 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00602409638554 0.00437022459523 138% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120481927711 0.00967000014798 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 941.0 1161.00487805 81% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.9 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27333333333 5.90752243213 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.337110787985 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.36 0.247514529752 145% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.253333333333 0.171178102325 148% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.112407865282 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91661904723 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.546246751206 115% => OK
Word variations: 56.1900861754 49.3433353143 114% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 8.93414634146 56% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0094962315 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.86774628 42.9750493124 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.2 135.714022679 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 23.0094962315 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.689975730869 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 66.0 47.7609492067 138% => OK
Elegance: 2.68 2.94281807926 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501416747146 0.418131533498 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.201575446077 0.181151798455 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.077790407396 0.0850326197045 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.815551919123 0.706616315825 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18608475505 0.157042692854 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317286525184 0.228904883108 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108468167727 0.108899403657 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.210589334369 0.367819155151 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0494852999006 0.0812612215331 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369733349318 0.316326947829 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114253905904 0.0921553760075 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 7.1512195122 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.