Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
All the scientist and the researchers who are in the research field should focus on their research. It is not important if it is for the good of the large number of people or not. It is helpful for the world that more and more researches are done. If they think that the mass population will not be able to afford it then 90% of the researches will be affected by it.
For a good matter, I don't support the statement. For example in the field of medical The reason behind this is a deadly disease "cancer" was impossible to cure a long time back. But there has been a development in the research center and now with proper precautions and medical attention it is possible to cure it. Millions of dollars were spent to find the proper treatment for cancer. However, at the time for this research, if someone in the research team had this thought of thinking for the mass people than, today a great number of people would be suffering by cancer. Scientist and researchers should do their work without thinking of the society, it is their job and they are trained to do so. It is the government who should be responsible for the benifit of the great number of people.
Another reason is that millions of dollars are spent on researches of these rare theories. There are numerous investors investing in these research. It is not confirmed that they do it for the good of the people or for their own profit. But if we think of them then they will suffer a great loss after investing a grand amount in the research and their money gets wasted on some research that is not so important at the moment or not needed at all. On the other hand, sometimes due to government pressure scientist and researchers are forced to do some reckless work for the sake of good of the people who are below the poverty line. In this case also two things are wasted, one is the precious time of the research teams who are capable of doing much more good job than some stupid research and another is the money invested in the project.
However, it is not 100% true that the research should be done only for those who can afford it neither only on the one which is deadly or important for future. Or they should not even waste time on somethings which is of no mean. Rather than sometimes it is good to think about a large number. For example in India there a some medicines available in the market which are not affordable by a common man. In India the poverty line is more than 40%, nearly half of the population of India. In a way if we think these high ranged medicines are useless to them. So a research should be made to make these medicines even cheap so that a good number of people can afford it. It is just example of one field but it is possible in various fields.
In a way sometimes it is good to think about the greater population but sometimes it is not worth it. Scientist and researchers are no there to think about anyone, they only have to think about is that it is beneficial or not. If there is a problem of thinking for a grand amount of people such that whether they will like the product or not or is it cost efficient or not, than there are other people who have a job to to think about these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 58
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- Scientists and researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 62
- Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that more and more researches are done. If they think that the mass population wil...
^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... affected by it. For a good matter, I dont support the statement. For example in t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... or not or is it cost efficient or not, than there are other people who have a job t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...n there are other people who have a job to to think about these issues.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201538461538 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0846153846154 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0538461538462 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.06 0.0444667217837 135% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.149230769231 0.12292977631 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0307692307692 0.0406280797675 76% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.40067879644 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0230769230769 0.030933414821 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115384615385 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.02 0.0249443105267 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0153846153846 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3211.0 2732.02544248 118% => OK
No of words: 602.0 452.878318584 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33388704319 6.0361032391 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95335121839 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.259136212625 0.366273622748 71% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.186046511628 0.280924506359 66% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.12292358804 0.200843997647 61% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0797342192691 0.132149295362 60% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40067879644 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.358803986711 0.48968727796 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.0859378842 55.4138127331 78% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2032436296 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.678571429 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 0.674092028746 42% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 40.1046511628 51.4728631049 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.42528735632 1.64882698954 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366845453013 0.391690518653 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135263054976 0.123202303941 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0960394009535 0.077325440228 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517892873751 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144061408177 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150276321927 0.161403998019 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932958802042 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.563874527848 0.385218514788 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0386818487249 0.0692045440612 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280191178049 0.275328986314 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765353224009 0.0653680567796 117% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.