Scientists and researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Every new breakthrough or invention that takes place in the medical field and/or otherwise is for the advancement of humans in general. Each and every research is done for the sole purpose of finding something new or finding something more advanced than the previous known fact that could make the world a better known place for the public. The issue given here implies that research should be only done in areas that are going to benefit the general population. This is a highly generalised statement for the reasons that will be stated below.
First and foremost, before any research, we are not sure of the result that we are going to obtain. Any research is going to be an experiment that might or might not give us the type of results that we expected. Hence, to generalise a statement as the one given and say that the research areas should be limited to a majority in not equitable. The research of a very small thing that has previously never been even minutely connected to a particular disease can be proven to be the ultimte cure for the disease here mentioned. And hence, unexpectedly turn out to be beneficial to the entire world.
Secondly, in a country like India where 1 person in 10 has tuberculosis which obviously doesn't constitute the majority and still measures up to 10.2 billion approximately, it is not correct to not focus on research in this area just because it's not the majority. Majority or not, It is a substantial number of people and hence there should be advancement in this field for the betterment of the society as a whole. I strongly believe that not one case should be discarded just because it hasn't yet affected the greater section of the people.
Also to be taken into account is the fact that had Galilleo never thought of and went on to prove that the earth was infact a sphere and not a flat surface, had he not researched it and had he believed the same ideology that was believed by the entire world, he wouldn't have ever been able to make this huge discovery. Hence, for advancements in all aspects of life, it is very necessary for scientists and researchers to research deeply into anything that they believe in and they think useful.
Having said the above, I also would like to say that it is also not righteous when a research is being done on a subject where there is no proper aim or goal and is just done peremptorily. Researchs are started because there are questions that are not answered yet and hence the researches are hoping to discover them for the world and for themselves. A lot of time, money and energy is invested in eavh of the experiments and hopes of a gazillion other people are attached with it. That shouldn't be taken lightly.
Thus, if there is a legit doubt and if there's a scope for further discovery or advancement in any field that might help the mankind and the world in general, research should be carried out by scientists, no matter how many people are finally affected by the result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Scientists and researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 62
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... in 10 has tuberculosis which obviously doesnt constitute the majority and still measu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ase should be discarded just because it hasnt yet affected the greater section of the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...the greater section of the people. Also to be taken into account is the fact th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...at was believed by the entire world, he wouldnt have ever been able to make this huge d...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 86, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... say that it is also not righteous when a research is being done on a subject where there ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...other people are attached with it. That shouldnt be taken lightly. Thus, if there i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 42, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... Thus, if there is a legit doubt and if theres a scope for further discovery or advanc...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.187279151943 0.240241500013 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.190812720848 0.157235817809 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0618374558304 0.0880659088768 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0865724381625 0.0497285424764 174% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0371024734982 0.0444667217837 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116607773852 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0600706713781 0.0406280797675 148% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57084427475 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030035335689 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00353356890459 0.0016655270985 212% => OK
Determiners: 0.116607773852 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212014134276 0.0249443105267 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0265017667845 0.0148568991511 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2986.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 531.0 452.878318584 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62335216573 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.299435028249 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227871939736 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154425612053 0.200843997647 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0922787193974 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57084427475 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 219.290929204 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478342749529 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 56.4711502142 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.9473684211 23.380412469 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4299304008 59.4972553346 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.157894737 141.124799967 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9473684211 23.380412469 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 0.674092028746 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 50.7345623947 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.15730337079 1.64882698954 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411515692253 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119026245517 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0760670577429 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.618113495596 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161116030341 0.149214159877 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174431520975 0.161403998019 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612064853863 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388213450997 0.385218514788 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0559294074112 0.0692045440612 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259166418463 0.275328986314 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036003437253 0.0653680567796 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.