The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
The table illustrates the social and economic growth in various four countries in the year of 1994 by United Nations report.
The table evident that, Japan had annual income per person (1576 $US), 99% of adult literacy rate, life expectancy at birth (78) and second highest daily calories supply per person. Canada had highest daily calories supply per person (3326), adult literacy same as Japan, no more difference between in life expectancy as compare to Japan, it was 76% and 11100 second highest annual income per person.
Albeit, another two countries had poorer economic and social growth. Peru had only 160$ annual income per person, it was more less then compare to Canada and Japan, but, it was greater than Zaire. Peru had less in all side compare to Canada and Japan, there were life expectancy at birth, daily calories supply and adult literacy rate had 51, 1927 and 68, respectively. While, Zaire was one of the country in 1994, who had only 34% of adult literacy.
All in all, it is appearance that, Japan and Canada had lots of development in 1994 compare to Peru and Zaire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-25 | mai alice | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | Phan Duy Phúc | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below show the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.Write a report for a university lecture describing the process shown. 78
- Many lives are in danger when hastily erected building collapse because safety standards have been sacrificed to get quick profits To prevent disaster of this kind government should play greater role in setting and enforcing safety standards for building 83
- Computers can translate all kinds of languages well so children don t need to learn more languages in future 44
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the social and eco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Japan had annual income per person 1576 , 99% of adult literacy rate, life expect...
^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...aily calories supply per person. Canada had highest daily calories supply per person 3326, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$160'.
Suggestion: $160
...onomic and social growth. Peru had only 160$ annual income per person, it was more l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...y 160$ annual income per person, it was more less then compare to Canada and Japan, but, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ual income per person, it was more less then compare to Canada and Japan, but, it wa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ual income per person, it was more less then compare to Canada and Japan, but, it wa...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.3133640553 0.268076937826 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.0829493087558 0.116061578633 71% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10599078341 0.0759168565197 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0276497695853 0.0366838410393 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0184331797235 0.0131127313244 141% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124423963134 0.155750635184 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0 0.0379272487307 0% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.23871724694 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0184331797235 0.0210936926555 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0460829493088 0.0948980150116 49% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00460829493088 0.00967000014798 48% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1096.0 1161.00487805 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.9 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82978723404 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367021276596 0.337110787985 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.207446808511 0.247514529752 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.101063829787 0.171178102325 59% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0585106382979 0.112407865282 52% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23871724694 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.546246751206 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.3639007397 49.3433353143 88% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5 23.0094962315 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7919263869 42.9750493124 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 135.714022679 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.0094962315 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.689975730869 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.48048780488 473% => OK
Readability: 44.2446808511 47.7609492067 93% => OK
Elegance: 3.39285714286 2.94281807926 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245955419164 0.418131533498 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.180604454026 0.181151798455 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.151049751788 0.0850326197045 178% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.725878435765 0.706616315825 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.225772286505 0.157042692854 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147548196768 0.228904883108 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129579524117 0.108899403657 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328541806444 0.367819155151 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.169348504287 0.0812612215331 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216061523318 0.316326947829 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151142208214 0.0921553760075 164% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.