The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.

The table illustrates the data some social and economic indicators for four nations, which were researched by United Nations in 1994. There were four indicators such as: annual income per person, life expectancy at birth, daily calorie supply per person and adult literacy rate.
It is apparent that, Canada and Japan were highest in research. Japan ranked first Annual income per person $15760 and life expectancy at birth in 78. Adult literacy rate was the same 99% and almost equal the number of life expectancy at birth between Canada and Japan which had 76 and 78 respectively. While daily calorie supply per person in Canada was highest 3326%.
By contrast, Peru and Zaire were poorer countries. Peru had only $160 for annual income per person, this statistic in Zaire was $130. Those income level much lower compared Canada and Japan about 10 time. Besides, Zaire was ranked lowest in the classify table for life expectancy at birth, daily calorie supply per person, adult literacy rate had 47, 1749, 34% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Japan which had 76 and 78 respectively. While daily calorie supply per person in Cana...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this income' or 'Those incomes'?
Suggestion: This income; Those incomes
...person, this statistic in Zaire was 30. Those income level much lower compared Canada and Ja...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...me. Besides, Zaire was ranked lowest in the classify table for life expectancy at birth, dai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02352941176 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29830688396 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2863173461 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117742372216 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058560227519 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127141888121 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111794076404 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125000612414 0.0819641961636 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.