Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Whether the government should provide funding for the arts has been heatedly debated in recent years. Some believe that the funding could prosper the arts thus are necessary, while others deem that the funding damages the integrity of the arts. Through scrutiny on this issue, the government funding is actually desirable even though it might cause some negative effects.
To begin with, we have to admit that the integrity of arts is important and the government funding could threaten the integrity to an extent. Arts have their distinctive characteristics among the numerous things in the world. They are selectively accepted in certain groups and more importantly, they tend to be far away from political affairs. The latter is quite significant for arts since part of the function of the arts are help people escape from the troubling life, sometimes the unpleasant politics, by providing people with natural beauty. Additionally, in some cases, arts could also be political when they serve as the supervisor of the political processes, examples including the satire and the ironic novels. Here, providing government funding could do harm to the independence of the arts since the interest of art parties is involved with that of the government and politicians. There is the risk that they tend to be the preacher of the authority.
The necessity of government funding, whereas, should not be denied due to the contingent disadvantages.
Undoubtedly, arts do need funding. On one hand, they are so important that they act as part of the spirit of a city, a culture and a nation. The Great Wall represents the patriotism of Chinese people and can make them very proud when referring to it. The Triumph is totally the landmark of France, standing for the spirit of liberty of French culture. Those are all arts. On the other hand, they are costly. The art work is usually done by only several people but spends tons of time and money. Without the strong support from the Empire, the Great Wall would not have been built. Having no funding from the government, the Triumph would not have stood for centuries. Hence, without government funding, it is pretty hard for arts to develop.
Considering both the pros and cons of the government funding, some measures could be adapted to reserve the merits while prevent the disadvantages. To separate political affairs and arts, the government could set up a fund which is regulated by several reputed nongovernment organizations. The funding is provided for art parties directly by the fund without knowing the origin. Thus the arts can remain objective when it comes to politics.
To sum up, the government funding has some negative aspects but we can adapt some measures to prevent them and make the funding prosper the art.
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 58
- To understand the most imporant characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 75
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 70
- The government wants to improve the education of high school, and there are two plans：1 choose a group of good teachers and train them first, and after that let them go back to schools and train other teachers.2 provide training for every teacher online 95
- The government wants to improve the education of high school, and there are two plans：1 choose a group of good teachers and train them first, and after that let them go back to schools and train other teachers.2 provide training for every teacher online 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...by the fund without knowing the origin. Thus the arts can remain objective when it c...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'in some cases', 'to begin with', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248532289628 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.154598825832 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0645792563601 0.0880659088768 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0469667318982 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0313111545988 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119373776908 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.041095890411 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69086641983 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027397260274 0.030933414821 89% => OK
Particles: 0.00391389432485 0.0016655270985 235% => OK
Determiners: 0.142857142857 0.0997080785238 143% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.027397260274 0.0249443105267 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00782778864971 0.0148568991511 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2784.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 461.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03904555315 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362255965293 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29284164859 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182212581345 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119305856833 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69086641983 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48590021692 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 55.1310368489 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7307692308 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8557344459 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.076923077 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7307692308 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.0149340898 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.75630252101 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.726532944126 0.391690518653 185% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106477078113 0.123202303941 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0770710097368 0.077325440228 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.561824586215 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.21580704229 0.149214159877 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.29166996182 0.161403998019 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140090578603 0.0892212321368 157% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.466091481862 0.385218514788 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0783751887458 0.0692045440612 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.493667348063 0.275328986314 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118604666033 0.0653680567796 181% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.