In the term of what application had great houses of the people who inhabited in Chaco Canyon in twelth century, both reading and the lecture have contradictory.
First, reading claims these massive building with many rooms plaid role of home for a great number of families and evidence which reading giving is the similarity of these structures to other building with housing application in other region. In lecture professor refutes this and states if a great number of families have lived in these building there would must be so many fire places using to cooking by them but no enough fireplaces were founded ther.
Second, for refuting second author theory which claims Chaco buildings were used to store food specially green maize for a long time, professor expresses no maize or maize container traces have been founded after excavating building so there couldn't be used as a food store.
Finally, reading claims people held up their ceremonies in these structures because near the building researcher founded a great amount of broken particle of pots using to drink in ceremonies. Professor states additional to pots some building materials also have been founded which shows these pots were used by workers who participate in build those structures.
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 86
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TOEFL TPO topics - Integrated Writing TasksTPO - 06 70
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nded after excavating building so there couldnt be used as a food store. Finally, rea...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.310185185185 0.261695866417 119% => OK
Verbs: 0.194444444444 0.158904122519 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0787037037037 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0324074074074 0.0435111971325 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00925925925926 0.0277247811725 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134259259259 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0787037037037 0.0370669169778 212% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.52591564611 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0231481481481 0.0208969081088 111% => OK
Particles: 0.00462962962963 0.00154638098197 299% => OK
Determiners: 0.0972222222222 0.128158765124 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00925925925926 0.0158828679856 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0277777777778 0.0114777025283 242% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1261.0 1645.83664459 77% => OK
No of words: 205.0 271.125827815 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1512195122 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380487804878 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268292682927 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175609756098 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112195121951 0.113142543107 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52591564611 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 54.7145864612 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 34.1666666667 21.7502111507 157% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8566877143 49.3711431718 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 210.166666667 132.220823453 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1666666667 21.7502111507 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.878197800319 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 60.9959349593 50.5018328374 121% => OK
Elegance: 2.21568627451 1.90840788429 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482348074802 0.549887131256 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157528543063 0.142949733639 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.068161057686 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.81699332854 0.631733273073 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132712097292 0.139662658121 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256071870486 0.266732575781 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111993375837 0.103435571967 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.169171012754 0.414875509568 41% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.076831582096 0.0530846634433 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313361656785 0.40443939384 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959709624965 0.0528353158467 182% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.