In the argument given, the author states that feed-in tariff is a very popular policy to promote renewable energy. His concerns are about the reluctance of home owners and large corporations to invest in this popular policy. Consequently, he states that feed-in tariff is stable and exceptional effective and hence, ought to be pursued more. At first glance the argument seems cogent and comprehensive, but on a thorough scrutiny of the argument we notice that the authors fails to provide any fact to support his argument. Moreover, he fails to provide any kind of analogy to a similar proven observation. The argument is rife with fallacies. There are several important question that need to be answered before accepting the author's recommendation.
Firstly, the author assumes that solar energy can be utilized all around the world at all times. This assumption is baseless as we know because of earth's rotation only one hemisphere of earth is exposed to the sun. Moreover, only the regions along the equator enjoy maximum exposure and hence only they can effectively use the solar energy. Many other factors such as weather and topology of the province also account for how well we can exploit the suns energy. Without providing any sort of explanation the argument is presents to be half cooked.
Secondly, the installation of the solar panels given to be a costly affair. But the cost of certain commodity being costly is subjective in nature. What might be costly for an average home owner might be penny worth for a large scale corporation with huge capital backing. Author assumes that if it were not for the strenuous economic conditions both home owners are corporates will have enough capital to invest on solar panels. This assumption is not based on any kind of statistic and cannot be accepted in its current form. The author needs to explore more and conduct surveys or base his contention on a previously proven observation.
Moreover, availability of property is taken for granted by the author. The author comfortably assumes that all home owners and corporations have enough property to place enough solar panels. There are no numbers provide such as the minimum average amount of land per home owner in a particular region where the panels were installed successfully to provide stable profits over time. The author needs to be more thorough with his supporting evidence before making such tall claims.
To conclude, the authors argument cannot be accepted as it is. There are some very important questions that he needs to ask before making assumptions. He also needs to work on providing supporting evidence where it is apt.
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 50
- Argument: The United States of America should dispense with the Electoral College. At present, the President and Vice President are selected in a process that does not give equal weight to all voters. Apart from Maine and Nebraska, states select electoral 66
- A recent survey of 250 adults between the ages of 30 and 45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and self-reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 hours 75
- Sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them.in return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility. 58
- Children should not be forced by law to be educated by private schools or home schooling if their parents do not wish them to be. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 728, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...eed to be answered before accepting the authors recommendation. Firstly, the author ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suns'' or 'sun's'?
Suggestion: suns'; sun's
...account for how well we can exploit the suns energy. Without providing any sort of e...
^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...g such tall claims. To conclude, the authors argument cannot be accepted as it is. T...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'kind of', 'sort of', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218487394958 0.25644967241 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.180672268908 0.15541462614 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121848739496 0.0836205057962 146% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0504201680672 0.0520304965353 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0336134453782 0.0272364105082 123% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115546218487 0.125424944231 92% => OK
Participles: 0.046218487395 0.0416121511921 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67519279937 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0399159663866 0.026700313972 149% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102941176471 0.113004496875 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0189075630252 0.0255425247493 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105042016807 0.0127820249294 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2655.0 2731.13054187 97% => OK
No of words: 439.0 446.07635468 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04783599089 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.57801047555 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398633257403 0.378187486979 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293849658314 0.287650121315 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.170842824601 0.208842608468 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107061503417 0.135150697306 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67519279937 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 207.018472906 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503416856492 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 56.928258052 52.1807786196 109% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.039408867 125% => OK
Sentence length: 17.56 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5789300008 57.7814097925 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 141.986410481 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.724660767414 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 46.9449658314 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.43650793651 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184879560013 0.441005458295 42% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.092753527478 0.135418324435 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0582300359782 0.0829849096947 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.485048198966 0.58762219726 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0913057466975 0.147661913831 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706437456158 0.193483328276 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421482313822 0.0970749176394 43% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.33787155413 0.42659136922 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0690450318126 0.0774707102158 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120493782788 0.312017818177 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034091324427 0.0698173142475 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.33743842365 180% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 6.46551724138 186% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 14.657635468 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.