The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:
"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlands has been prohibited. Now local development interests are lobbying for the West Lansburg council to allow an access road to be built along the edge of wetlands. Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria, which had a similar sanctuary, has seen its sea otter population decline since the repeal of its sanctuary status in 1978. In order to preserve the region's biodiversity and ensure a healthy environment, the West Lansburg council should not allow the road to be built."
The letter to the editor states a few important points, 1) Tufted groundhog population is in millions 2) Local interest to develop the coastal wetlands.
3) Eastern Carpenteria's sea otter population decline. There are several pro and cons to think about.
Firstly, Humans have a tendency to explore, and several people do not consider the consequences of doing so. The letter states that the tufted groundhog numbered in millions, according to te ancient records. But the statement is ambiguous, as the count of the tufted groundhogs at present could much lesser, or could be at the verge of extinction. Considering that fact, wildlife sanctuary surely helps the survival of the tufted groundhog and any disturbance to their peaceful environment could create an undesirable situation.
Considering it the other way, If the tufted groundhog are still numbered in millions, a minor development without harming the environment could be considered.
Secondly, the request on the basis of local interests to develop an access road along the edges of coastal wetlands, does not provide a clear idea, as to why they require a road through the coastal wetlands? Without a specific reason, a decision cannot be made.
Thirdly, a similar situation in the Eastern Carpenteria has shown a negative impact on the sea otter population. through which we can understand that, disturbing the harmonic life of the wildlife could lead to their population decrease. As in this situation where the exact count of current tufted groundhog is unavailable, to take a risk in that region's biodiversity is not suggested.
To conclude, the road through coastal wetlands of West Lansburg should not be built without proper details of 1) why the road must be built?
2) What is the exact count of the tufted groundhog? and 3) how will the development impact on the biodiversity?
Without specific answers to these important questions, the West Lansburg council should not allow the road to be built.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | sandeshbhandari2 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Adebayo | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | banu.abdikadirova | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Ramzah Rehman | 16 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | dhruvsawhney | 24 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 58
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
- The article states that the animals show altruistic behaviours, where an animal sacrifices it's interest for other animals in the group, and states that altruism is the opposite of selfishness, the article comes up with three reasons to support the claim. 83
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 83
- some young adults require independence from their parents at an early age while some do not. what do you support and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could create an undesirable situation. Considering it the other way, If the tuf...
^^^
Line 9, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Through
...ive impact on the sea otter population. through which we can understand that, disturbin...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... is unavailable, to take a risk in that regions biodiversity is not suggested. To c...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 53, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...he exact count of the tufted groundhog? and 3 how will the development impact on th...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'thirdly', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244382022472 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.140449438202 0.15541462614 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101123595506 0.0836205057962 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0365168539326 0.0520304965353 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0140449438202 0.0272364105082 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10393258427 0.125424944231 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0421348314607 0.0416121511921 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89002696516 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0365168539326 0.026700313972 137% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.137640449438 0.113004496875 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0308988764045 0.0255425247493 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0196629213483 0.0127820249294 154% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1981.0 2731.13054187 73% => OK
No of words: 320.0 446.07635468 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.190625 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.40625 0.378187486979 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.325 0.287650121315 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225 0.208842608468 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153125 0.135150697306 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89002696516 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 207.018472906 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534375 0.469332199767 114% => OK
Word variations: 55.93143013 52.1807786196 107% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8235294118 23.2022227129 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5677626289 57.7814097925 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.529411765 141.986410481 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 23.2022227129 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.724660767414 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 5.14285714286 175% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 51.3235294118 51.9672348444 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.04411764706 1.8405768891 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.635141944931 0.441005458295 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.083218296291 0.135418324435 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0563682155218 0.0829849096947 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.702252770964 0.58762219726 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.212915782612 0.147661913831 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.270622761784 0.193483328276 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157795015198 0.0970749176394 163% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.195458813738 0.42659136922 46% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0970739874457 0.0774707102158 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350279275213 0.312017818177 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145026177692 0.0698173142475 208% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.