TPO15_Integrated
The article states that we can eliminate cane toads from Australi because they become a treat for native species and provides three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor explains that all of that three reasons are impossible or maybe be more dangerous for our environments and repudiates each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that we can use a national fence to prevent moving the cane toad from our country and he introduced that one time they tried this solution for saving rabbits. Conversely, the speaker refuses this points by imparting that maybe this is a good solution at first sight, but the fences are holding the matures cane toads and eggs and young cane toads can across the fence. After moving to other sides of the fences they start to growth and in fact, it is not a rational solution.
In addition, the passage points that we can use a specific virus for killing them from where we want to eliminate them. However, the lecture says that there are many domestic animals that nutrition from the cane toads and by poisoning this type of amphibian species consequently the native species are going to die.
Finally, the text contents that there are many volunteers that can capture the young toads and cane toads eggs. On the contrary, the lecture opposes this point by expressing that many of the volunteers don't have any training about this ability, and while they want to pick the youngs toads and cane toads eggs up, maybe removing other types of the national species. We also learn that this is a huge problem that can't solve by this shallow solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-04 | masoud5676 | 81 | view |
| 2015-10-01 | ece-16 | 90 | view |
| 2015-08-14 | saharpouya | 80 | view |
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 65
- TPO15_Integrated 81
- technology 85
- Tpo11 task2 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Comments
Essay evaluation report
and he introduced that one time
and he told that one time
Sentence: Conversely, the speaker refuses this points by imparting that maybe this is a good solution at first sight, but the fences are holding the matures cane toads and eggs and young cane toads can across the fence.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to can and across
they start to growth and in fact
they start to grow and in fact //growth is a noun
by this shallow solutions.
by this shallow solution.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 278 250
No. of Characters: 1300 1200
No. of Different Words: 145 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.083 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.676 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.242 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.542 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.9 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.658 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.159 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... expressing that many of the volunteers dont have any training about this ability, a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 414, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... learn that this is a huge problem that cant solve by this shallow solutions.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238255033557 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.161073825503 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0771812080537 0.0723426182421 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0335570469799 0.0435111971325 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0503355704698 0.0277247811725 182% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127516778523 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0335570469799 0.0370669169778 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.29643753601 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201342281879 0.0208969081088 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00335570469799 0.00154638098197 217% => OK
Determiners: 0.130872483221 0.128158765124 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0167785234899 0.0158828679856 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134228187919 0.0114777025283 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1603.0 1645.83664459 97% => OK
No of words: 277.0 271.125827815 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78700361011 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.303249097473 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238267148014 0.287516216867 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151624548736 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0794223826715 0.113142543107 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29643753601 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 52.6835875297 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.7 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.84535377 49.3711431718 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.3 132.220823453 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.878197800319 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 51.5267148014 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.6301369863 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.655931143267 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182121116497 0.142949733639 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0850787760723 0.0787303798458 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.673013038403 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128945818971 0.139662658121 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.328603709407 0.266732575781 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123928946374 0.103435571967 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398010205092 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0575433842234 0.0530846634433 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.472828220532 0.40443939384 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785602755629 0.0528353158467 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.