TPO 46
Both the reading and speaking try to discuss about the evidence (structures) which was found about bees' nests. Although the reading states that these fossils were not created by bees, the lecturer disagrees with them all and brings three reasons to refute the ideas mentioned by reading.
First of all, the reading asserts that the actual bees did not exist 200 million years ago and the earliest body preserved of them is related to 100 million years ago. On the contrary, the professor provides the reason to refute this idea due to the fact that probably, 200 million years ago, there was not any preserving technique which bees were able to utilize. Most of insects employed some sticky resins to be preserved. Therefore, lacking the fossils in that era is not the reason of not existence of bees.
Furthermore, the author presents another theory that in that time, 200 million years ago, there were not any flowers which bees could feed. So, they were not able to be in that time. Conversely, the lecturer rejects this idea due to this concept that some bees could be evolve in that time and feed on none flowery plants such as pine trees. Consequently, they could be survived without flowers.
Finally, the passage argues that the modern bees have the caps as a chamber in their nests, but the structures which were found have not this details. On the other hand, the speaker dismisses this reason and believe that it is highly erroneous due to the fact that there were some chemical evidence which can help to prove this concept that this cap might be distracted by chemical reaction. Besides, in the found structure, there were some evidence about water proof materials which exist in modern bees' nests too. Therefore, this structures belong to the bees at 200 million years ago.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take basic science courses even if it is not the field of their study. 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the insects') or simply say ''Most insects''.
Suggestion: Most of the insects; Most insects
...hnique which bees were able to utilize. Most of insects employed some sticky resins to be prese...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...ructure, there were some evidence about water proof materials which exist in modern bees ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'so', 'therefore', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235294117647 0.261695866417 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.155882352941 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.05 0.0723426182421 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0705882352941 0.0435111971325 162% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0176470588235 0.0277247811725 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102941176471 0.128828473217 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0411764705882 0.0370669169778 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.2543482281 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352941176471 0.0208969081088 169% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.141176470588 0.128158765124 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0147058823529 0.0158828679856 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0205882352941 0.0114777025283 179% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1787.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80194805195 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.305194805195 0.374372842146 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233766233766 0.287516216867 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142857142857 0.187439937562 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0779220779221 0.113142543107 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2543482281 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496753246753 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.7384964142 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9921673816 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.642857143 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 45.3766233766 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.55421686747 1.90840788429 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289415292319 0.549887131256 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147731253127 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0826824483882 0.0787303798458 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.604465242295 0.631733273073 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158377331134 0.139662658121 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138947840893 0.266732575781 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527943894308 0.103435571967 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388853092646 0.414875509568 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.019356511239 0.0530846634433 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213392333332 0.40443939384 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435085054294 0.0528353158467 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.