Author’s claim that popularity of skateboarding has decreased the number of shoppers does not have any substantiation. There is rife of holes and assumptions made in the claim. Owner in the claim have prediction regarding the cause, without any validation.
It is possible that there no connection between decrease in business and increase in skateboarders. For example, there is new kind of skateboard launched by company and highly popular in the society, because of which there is increase in skateboarders and at the same time Central plaza store started losing its shoppers. Another cause for decrease in business might be new stores are opened in just in front of Central Plaza and new stores are providing ample amount of discounts on goods. It is also possible that Central Plaza sold faulty product which lead to negative marketing among the shoppers. Shoppers might not be happy with Central Plaza service. Owner needs to verify possible causes to decrease in business. It is possible that people are coming to central plaza for only window shopping or just to pass their time.
Author claims that there is increase in amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza because of skateboarders. It is possible that Central Plaza is sullied by the food plazas in the Central Plazas. Kids coming in the central plaza trashing in the plaza. Plaza might not be having installed trash management. Owner should first consult plaza management for the possible cause.
Owner stipulates that skateboarding should be prohibited in Central Plaza. It might be possible that current shoppers from Central plaza prefer to come by skateboard and reluctant to leave that. This will again decrease the shoppers. Author’s claim seems to lacks in corroboration. This prediction may have negative consequences on Central plaza stores business.
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 58
- Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and city center has doubled their commuting time.The favored proposal of motorist lobby is to widen the highway, addding an addditional lane of traffic.But last year 50
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'lack'.
Suggestion: lack
... shoppers. Author's claim seems to lacks in corroboration. This prediction may h...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'for example', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.30981595092 0.25644967241 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.159509202454 0.15541462614 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0766871165644 0.0836205057962 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0306748466258 0.0520304965353 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.021472392638 0.0272364105082 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.156441717791 0.125424944231 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0460122699387 0.0416121511921 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82659020383 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0245398773006 0.026700313972 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0644171779141 0.113004496875 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0245398773006 0.0255425247493 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00613496932515 0.0127820249294 48% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1853.0 2731.13054187 68% => OK
No of words: 295.0 446.07635468 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2813559322 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396610169492 0.378187486979 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294915254237 0.287650121315 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213559322034 0.208842608468 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122033898305 0.135150697306 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82659020383 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 207.018472906 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481355932203 0.469332199767 103% => OK
Word variations: 47.0202853501 52.1807786196 90% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.75 23.2022227129 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3068989885 57.7814097925 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.65 141.986410481 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 23.2022227129 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.724660767414 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 44.2415254237 51.9672348444 85% => OK
Elegance: 2.42028985507 1.8405768891 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518582133754 0.441005458295 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.130883664577 0.135418324435 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0960767597819 0.0829849096947 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494790805872 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137036302341 0.147661913831 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199224814269 0.193483328276 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978928429532 0.0970749176394 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.377599843684 0.42659136922 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.116851478404 0.0774707102158 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377442052341 0.312017818177 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587602972347 0.0698173142475 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.82512315271 249% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.82389162562 319% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
More arguments wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.