Essay topics: Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
----------
To say that something is positive and good or negative and bad, you should have the knowledge about what you judge. Judgment is a critical process in any operation and the workers should consider and determine the feedback they get. In my opinion, judgment process should be limited in people who have the sufficient experience about what they judge.
First of all, judgment has a crucial impact on the worker. That impact may help the quality of work to increase, in contrast, the impact may decrease the quality and destroy everything. All that depend on who is responsible about the judgment and how much his or her judgment is accurate. If everyone can judge everything and say his or her opinions on some everthing, that will reduce the efficient on the workers. The workers may take seriously what they hear and follow the tips and feedback they received, consequently, they go in the wrong way because what they hear is not accurate and just talk from ordinary people who like to keep talking all the time. Moreover, some people are extremely bad when they judge and they critisize in bad way and that may have negative effect on the work and make them lose their trust in their abilities.
Furthermore, when we restrict the judgment in professional people and experts, we increase the percent to enhance the product. When we say experts, we mean people who have spent years in specific field of science and that give them the ability to give beneficial tips and feedback. In addition, because of their experiences over the years, they can give their opinions and a good way that the workers can accept them easily and do not consider the opinions as orders or anything else. For example, most of the experts try always to use the statement “I think it will be better if we …” rather than “change this by x elements”. We all know that the words we receive have a deep impact in us.
Finally, it is not bad to have some limited feedback from ordinary and non professional people. That limited opinions may have good feedback that are worth to be considered. We should make balance between what we hear and get from ordinary people and experts. Sometimes you may get an idea from a person and that idea helps to boost the work and increase the result.
In sum, we should be balanced to consider the opinions and feedback we get from people. Workers should take seriously what they get from experts and try to benefit from every tips the experts provide. On the other hand, workers should get some feedback from ordinary people, take advantages from the good ones and ignore the negative ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... responsible about the judgment and how much his or her judgment is accurate. If eve...
^^^^
Line 7, column 519, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'try'.
Suggestion: always try
... else. For example, most of the experts try always to use the statement 'I think it w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., take advantages from the good ones and ignore the negative ones.
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'for example', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204322200393 0.25644967241 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.16699410609 0.15541462614 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0687622789784 0.0836205057962 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333988212181 0.0520304965353 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0785854616896 0.0272364105082 289% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.098231827112 0.125424944231 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0098231827112 0.0416121511921 24% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.47227975032 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0216110019646 0.026700313972 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102161100196 0.113004496875 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0353634577603 0.0255425247493 138% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0314341846758 0.0127820249294 246% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2634.0 2731.13054187 96% => OK
No of words: 457.0 446.07635468 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7636761488 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.57801047555 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326039387309 0.378187486979 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25601750547 0.287650121315 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181619256018 0.208842608468 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0787746170678 0.135150697306 58% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47227975032 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 207.018472906 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424507658643 0.469332199767 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.7754589463 52.1807786196 90% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7619047619 23.2022227129 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6900639299 57.7814097925 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 141.986410481 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7619047619 23.2022227129 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.724660767414 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 47.363655309 51.9672348444 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.11971830986 1.8405768891 61% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152976808583 0.441005458295 35% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14832493728 0.135418324435 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0877771223546 0.0829849096947 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.576193018751 0.58762219726 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0966311184342 0.147661913831 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733145059361 0.193483328276 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375555747769 0.0970749176394 39% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.440669216388 0.42659136922 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0564786111603 0.0774707102158 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107763690281 0.312017818177 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276379527529 0.0698173142475 40% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.