A person should not take an important decision alone.
In our life, we often faces dilemma in which we have to choose the best choice for ourselves. Some people decide not to involve others to take this decision, while other people always share the options available to others as to get any robust foundation to support their decision. Personally, I agree with the latter statement that involving more people in deciding decision will bring many advantages.
First of all, if we make an important decision individually, some unintended consequences may occur unless we don't make fallacious decision. Often people didn’t realize that they rashly jump into the conclusion without considering some important aspects. Take, for example, a graduate from undergraduate program who wants to pursue his master degree in foreign country. Despite spending much time to research his dream school on tuition fees, graduate admission requirements, and reliable university ranking prior to taking decision, he fails to address other important issues not provided in internet such as quality of lecturers, and major problems in current facilities that students in that university know.
Second, along with sharing our dilemma with others that may make us relieve, reasonable people would agree that information seeker can get myriad information by sharing one another. In addition, by asking other people's suggestions, the time needed to find this essential facts may decrease and save us much time, particularly if the time available is closer to the deadline. Furthermore, by consulting with experts and experience people, we can also gain understanding and much knowledge regarding a wide variety of option that we should choose. Take, for example, if a president would take a decision regarding two different technology in construction of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) processing plant, he then asks his experts to give them insights comparing and contrasting these technologies.
Last but not least, although we ask other people to advise us on which option you should take, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the decision that we take should align with other suggestion. Unless we believe with others' feedback, we can go back to our first choice without any pressure.
To reiterate, making an important decision individually would not be as effective as taking decision by involving many insightful brains. It is undoubtedly true that by doing the latter, we can save time to get myriad information and avoid us making specious decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for 66
- There will be fewer cars in use in twenty years. 73
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe 48
- People learn things better from those at their own level--such as fellow students or co-workers--from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors. 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tended consequences may occur unless we dont make fallacious decision. Often people ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng and contrasting these technologies. Last but not least, although we ask othe...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228310502283 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.168949771689 0.158761421928 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0958904109589 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0479452054795 0.046263068375 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0684931506849 0.0685040099705 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118721461187 0.118717715034 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0479452054795 0.0351676179071 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87154929649 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0388127853881 0.0309702414327 125% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0570776255708 0.0887237588012 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0319634703196 0.0209618222197 152% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114155251142 0.0139019557991 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2489.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 389.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39845758355 5.86048508987 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.424164524422 0.338922669872 125% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.313624678663 0.251872472559 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.239074550129 0.174417080927 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172236503856 0.112833075102 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87154929649 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570694087404 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 66.3426397074 59.2087087015 112% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 25.9333333333 20.5533526081 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7189143897 48.84282405 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.933333333 120.699889404 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.5533526081 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.06666666667 0.644075263715 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 57.2958011997 45.7405998639 125% => OK
Elegance: 1.384 1.45489161554 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178425225104 0.300154397459 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.072528200856 0.103427244359 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.038474352189 0.0752933317313 51% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52967953297 0.497263757937 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143040062941 0.151897553556 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071677310961 0.114077575197 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708975362049 0.0781384742642 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.253319085816 0.336927656856 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0535202602306 0.067059652881 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125025503985 0.210909579961 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438752559712 0.0618886996521 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.