People pursuing intellectual interest for personal reasons are more likely to benefit the society than people who act for public good.
As we all know people pursue intellectual interest for several reasons: some might be motivated by the personal benefit while there are cases of altruistic people whose main goal is the welfare of the society. I partially agree with the authors claim as I have experienced or heard the story of many self centered as well as altruistic people.
Some people in this world are always concern for the society rather than their own well being. When we look back to the history, we can get the example of several great people who spend their whole life only for the society and their upcoming generations. To bolster my opinion, I would like to give example of India’s great leader Mahatma Gandhi. By profession, he was lawyer. Most of the time worried about Indian people, he is merely known as lawyer but his great achievement provided him the title of the “Father of India”. During his tenure, India was ruled by the British people. Indian had to bear lots of hardship, for British rule. It seems nearly impossible to wipe out British influence. However, Mahatma Gandhi got off protest against them. With continuous dedication, he was able to overthrow British rule and free India.
Similarly, Mother Teresa strikes on our mind while remembering great social worker of the world. Since her childhood, she had keen connection with the destitute and vulnerable person of the society. She pursued her career, However, Her goal was to help poor and disable people of the society. During her lifetime, she did many heroic deeds for the poor like built school, orphanage. Despite her educational attainment from well known schools and college, she tirelessly made her effort for the poor people.
On the other hand, there are people who provide their contribution to the society unknowingly. On the way of pursuing their dream, they are able to benefit society and get credit for their deeds. For Instance, One of the greatest doctors of Nepal, Bola Rijal was in first motivated by his own greed. He pursued his degree to get good job, to have well settled family, to get some status on the society. However, He is now known among the Nepalese people as saver of life. Till now, he has rescued thousands of life from the death. Therefore, we cannot overlook him when time comes to deal about the social worker.
In a nutshell, it’s obvious that people who gain education or intellectual thing for the welfare of the society is beneficial for the society. At the same time we should not overlook great deeds of people who made for society while accomplishing their target.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-17 | sharmasaugat2012 | 70 | view |
- Government should provide education free of cost to the students who go to the colleges but can not afford the college 50
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts. 58
- EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN A SOCIETY HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO OBEY JUST LAWS AND TO DISOBEY AND RESIST UNJUST LAWS. 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 58
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciety while accomplishing their target.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'similarly', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for instance', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23865877712 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.134122287968 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0966469428008 0.0880659088768 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0453648915187 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0828402366864 0.0444667217837 186% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130177514793 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0276134122288 0.0406280797675 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5180341276 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025641025641 0.030933414821 83% => OK
Particles: 0.00394477317554 0.0016655270985 237% => OK
Determiners: 0.0729783037475 0.0997080785238 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00986193293886 0.0249443105267 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0138067061144 0.0148568991511 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2926.0 2732.02544248 107% => OK
No of words: 440.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.65 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254545454545 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.143181818182 0.200843997647 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0931818181818 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5180341276 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 62.4678416739 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9230769231 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3521568258 59.4972553346 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.538461538462 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 42.3776223776 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.51127819549 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362241872778 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108235470127 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0891330488094 0.077325440228 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.474982987686 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177559723545 0.149214159877 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118611977797 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907639538544 0.0892212321368 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.325093632169 0.385218514788 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0301083754738 0.0692045440612 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249299546031 0.275328986314 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541159011637 0.0653680567796 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.