By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The death penalty is one of the punishment methods and it commits another crime. Thus, life in prison appears to be the most effective punishments. Even though I agree with the death penalty is committing of a crime, the life in prison is not the most effective punishment, because the current prison systems are not effective. Hence, we should look for other alternative method to punish those criminals.
The death penalty could be the most effective way to reduce crime rates; however I believe this is not the case, because there are various ways to punish criminals such as life in sentences, serving the prison working hours and helping with local community works. The victim’s relatives could get the feeling of relief and satisfaction of the death penalty for murderers, but this will not bring victim backs to a life and this is a short term gratification. Therefore, people can look for other alternative methods instead of looking for the short term gratification by killing murderers,.
One of those alternative methods is the life sentence in prison, but due to the malfunction of current systems in prison, this is no longer suitable. The main purpose of prison is educating and acknowledging criminals’ wrong doing behaviours which to be socially acceptable by having regrettable minds. However, the current prison systems are too luxurious to fade its original purposes. Currently, all prisoners are served in luxurious facilities (clean rooms, shower booths and bed sheets) with roommates for comfort living styles. Thus, life in prison cannot be the most suitable method to punish criminals.
Since all the methods are currently available do not suit for punishing criminals, people should create a new form of systems under some criteria, which should bound by; the purpose of punish criminals are educational and the nature of punishment should not violation of current laws. For example, since the death penalty violates the current existing laws of killing a person, this is not suitable under these criteria. People have invented with new criminal laws and by frequently updated, I believe we can create suitable punishment systems that could fit the criteria of punishment.
In conclusion, due to the violation of criminal laws, the capital punishment is not the effective punishment and the life in prison will be the same for the malfunction with the current prison systems. Therefore, the most suitable and effective approaches should be sought by the responsibilities for everyone.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-27 | rahulsd | 78 | view |
2019-10-05 | yuanyuan791 | 61 | view |
2019-07-28 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
2018-12-15 | BHAUMIK | 56 | view |
2018-11-23 | amrit_4071 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The map below is of the town of Gralsdon. A new supermarket is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 67
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below gives information from a 22008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... term gratification by killing murderers,. One of those alternative methods is th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257709251101 0.247107183377 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.143171806167 0.155533422707 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0991189427313 0.0946595960268 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0638766519824 0.0501214627716 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0154185022026 0.0437548338989 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112334801762 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0374449339207 0.0403226058552 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85280411602 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220264317181 0.0326793684256 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112334801762 0.0861772015684 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0286343612335 0.021408717616 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00660792951542 0.011925033212 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2520.0 1933.35771543 130% => OK
No of words: 404.0 316.048096192 128% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23762376238 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20517956788 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.423267326733 0.374742101984 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309405940594 0.28420135186 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19801980198 0.203846283523 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155940594059 0.137316102897 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85280411602 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.037074148 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457920792079 0.56093040696 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.0525406135 60.7387585426 81% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7647058824 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.363706063 49.517814964 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.235294118 127.492653851 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 54.7052999418 49.1944974215 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.83168316832 1.69124875643 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376997909502 0.332605444948 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14997423638 0.102741220458 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0941640217634 0.0668466124924 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.596310198901 0.534860350844 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176071156246 0.148594505496 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165392119638 0.134430193775 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734811137842 0.0742795772207 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425018676024 0.324371583561 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0939256468111 0.0638462369009 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273719758721 0.228012699653 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462429150889 0.058150111329 80% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.68436873747 35% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 5.90881763527 34% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.5751503006 349% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.