Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The topic raises the controversial issue of whether any leader of an organization should not remain in power more than 5 five years. Effectively, the leader of each organization should be changed from times to times in order to revitalize the organization. Nevertheless, establishing the fixed time of 5 years is probably not correct. Thus, I would argue to assure the success of any organization, it is essential to change its leadership but the frequency at it should occur depends from case to case.
First of all, if some person stays in the leadership of an organization for too much time, they will probably become blinded by their power. As a consequence, they will try to earn more and more, without caring about the ones in the organization with less power. In addition, there are an increased chance for them to practice corruption.
Secondly, older leaders tend to do their jobs more routinely. On contrary, a new leader has always new ideas they want to implement and will see problems through another perspective. Therefore, there are a greater chance for a private enterprise to differentiate from others and become more lucrative or, in case of public organizations, there is an increased chance to get better solutions for population’s problems. For instance, whenever a new government is implemented, new reforms are also implemented, some of them being beneficial for the population.
Lastly, the amount of time of 5 years cannot be adequate to all situations. It depends primarily on the projects each leader wants to implement. 5 years can be too little time for someone who wants to construct another building for instance, but it can be too much if for example some private enterprise just want to try some new product. The amount of time each leader should spend in each organization depends on their projects because it does not make much sense to change leadership when some project is the middle of its execution. This is because the new leader will not probably understand all the older leader wanted to do and will not concretize the project efficiently. If it happens whenever the leadership changes neither project will be concretized efficiently. On the other hand, if one stays in the leadership more time than they really need there is the risk for the leader to be the most of their leadership doing not much new things that can make the enterprise successful.
In conclusion, it is very important to periodically change the leader of an enterprise in order to revitalize it. However, the number of years each leader stays in an enterprise should depend on the projects this person has in mind and it should not be fixed in five years.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'nevertheless', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212424849699 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.14629258517 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0741482965932 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0681362725451 0.0497285424764 137% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0440881763527 0.0444667217837 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12625250501 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0200400801603 0.0406280797675 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.9401406314 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0400801603206 0.030933414821 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112224448898 0.0997080785238 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0340681362725 0.0249443105267 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0100200400802 0.0148568991511 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2682.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 452.0 452.878318584 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93362831858 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340707964602 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.234513274336 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174778761062 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141592920354 0.132149295362 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9401406314 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435840707965 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.9986844479 55.4138127331 87% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7106376946 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.95 0.674092028746 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 46.0513274336 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.38759689922 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32905883434 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118825397095 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0756195403925 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.555109507699 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143745921431 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136125435056 0.161403998019 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648062645769 0.0892212321368 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347584110002 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0554255241087 0.0692045440612 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235281783396 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468087759512 0.0653680567796 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.