TPO 5
In this set of material, the article and the lecture disagree on the theories used to explain the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico which known as the great houses which include the many rows number of hundred rooms and the reason of that places in the past or for what for it built. The reading passage states three universally theories about that house. The article suggests that it might be used as real residential purposes, or for storage or may be for special ceremonies. In contrary, the professor in the lecture challenges those theories proving they are all skeptical. Following three explanation to his perspective.
First of all, the reading passage claims that this house probably used as a residential reason or for people to live inside it. Furthermore, the house' outside architectural structure is similar to that architecture seen in most modern South societies building apartments. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt this theory; he believes that it did the design of this house looks similar from the outside, but it is different from inside. Moreover, the professor thinks if that house used for living purposes why there were a limited number of fireplaces to cook inside it, while there were hundred of rooms to live, that place was suitable for ten families not for hundred.
Second, the passage asserts other theory that this house used for maize storage purposes. Because crop would be able to store for a long time without spoiling. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this theory; he argues that the excavation of that place shows that this place was not cover any maize container. If this place used for storage, why there was not any storage tank.
Last but not the least, the author states that this house might be employed for ritual or ceremonial purposes, the writer thinks the structure of that building is similar to the structures of Pueblo populations. Also, the presence of several deposited broken pots. Whereas the listening passage rebuffs this theory of the article, he suggests that the evidence of the passage were insufficient to support this theory. The professor adds that if this place used to hold some of the ceremonal actions, it must include other container tools besides those pots, He proposes that those pots might be trash containers of building materials, they are not good evidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement teachers should not share their social or political opinions with their students? Give specific reasons to support your idea. 70
- Do you Agree or Disagree with the statement Following? Technology has made less creative than They Were Children in the Past. Use specific examples and Reasons to Support your answer. 80
- Tpo11 80
- Tpo32 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Comments
Essay evaluation report
to explain the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico which known as the great houses
to explain the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico which is known as the great houses
to explain the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico known as the great houses
this house probably used as a residential reason
this house is probably used as a residential reason
casts doubt this theory
casts doubt on this theory
if that house used for living purposes
if that house is used for living purposes
this place was not cover any maize container.
this place was not covering any maize container.
this place did not cover any maize container.
If this place used for storage,
If this place is used for storage,
Sentence: The professor adds that if this place used to hold some of the ceremonal actions, it must include other container tools besides those pots, He proposes that those pots might be trash containers of building materials, they are not good evidence.
Error: ceremonal Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Words: 391 250 //Write the essay in 20 minutes.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 12
No. of Words: 391 250
No. of Characters: 1913 1200
No. of Different Words: 180 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.447 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.893 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.438 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.848 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.512 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
... reason or for people to live inside it.Furthermore, the house outside architectural struct...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ces to cook inside it, while there were hundred of rooms to live, that place was suitab...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 675, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...e was suitable for ten families not for hundred. Second, the passage asserts other the...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...or adds that if this place used to hold some of the ceremonal actions, it must include othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.13785046729 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.088785046729 0.0723426182421 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0303738317757 0.0435111971325 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0303738317757 0.0277247811725 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144859813084 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.035046728972 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56404615323 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0233644859813 0.0208969081088 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.144859813084 0.128158765124 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140186915888 0.0158828679856 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116822429907 0.0114777025283 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2344.0 1645.83664459 142% => OK
No of words: 390.0 271.125827815 144% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01025641026 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04852973271 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35641025641 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279487179487 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171794871795 0.187439937562 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110256410256 0.113142543107 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56404615323 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494871794872 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.5276775063 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.375 21.7502111507 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0511651098 49.3711431718 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 132.220823453 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 21.7502111507 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 52.3237179487 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.16470588235 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102927973503 0.142949733639 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0859601904104 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.571327860507 0.631733273073 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.188008489232 0.139662658121 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.442397988825 0.414875509568 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0452740822154 0.0530846634433 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.