Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a big business. Rare and important fossils are now being sold to private ownership for millions of dollars. This is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public. The public suffers because fossils that would otherwise be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who do not allow the public to view their collections. Making it harder for the public to see fossils can lead to a decline in public interest in fossils, which would be a pity. More importantly, scientists are likely to lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. Wealthy fossil buyers with a desire to own the rarest and most important fossils can spend virtually limitless amounts of money to acquire them. Scientists and the museums and universities they work for often cannot compete successfully for fossils against millionaire fossil buyers. Moreover, commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they unearth. Most commercial fossil collectors are untrained or uninterestedin carrying out the careful field work and documentation that reveal the most about animal life in the past. For example, scientists have learned about the biology of nest-building dinosaurs called oviraptors by carefully observing the exact position of oviraptor fossils in the ground and the presence of other fossils in the immediate surroundings. Commercial fossil collectors typically pay no attention to how fossils lie in the ground or to the smaller fossils that may surround bigger ones.
The article states that the selling and buying fossils by private collectors is an unfortunate development for both scientists and the general public and provides three reasons for support. On the other hand, the professor says that the reading is exaggerating and selling and buying fossils by private collectors has not such disadvantages and refutes each author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that private collectors benefit from this by themselves and refuse to have a public exhibit of their collection and deprive people to see fossils. However, professor disagrees by saying that the collectors could be schools or communities that probably are going to have an exhibit.
Second, although the reading says that commercial fossil collectors deprive scientists to access some of the most important fossils and scientists miss out extinct life forms, the professor is of the conviction that an expert person going to identical fossils before their sells and that scientist does not miss out any important.
Last but not least, the reading states that commercial fossil collector often destroy valuable scientific evidence and when they are digging out fossils, they may destroy other kinds surrounding them. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that there were not be lots kind of fossils if commercial fossil collectors did not exist. He says that collectors try hard to achieve more fossils and even though they cause damage to fossils, they remain less undiscovered fossils.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 83
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she looked like. For a long time, the o 67
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it became known resembl 78
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 72
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Note: You can find all TPO topics here:
http://www.testbig.com/toefl
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 12
No. of Words: 236 250
No. of Characters: 1248 1200
No. of Different Words: 125 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.919 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.288 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.599 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.042 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.475 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.75 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.205 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...development for both scientists and the general public and provides three reasons for support....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...his point by saying that there were not be lots kind of fossils if commercial foss...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'kind of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252964426877 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.166007905138 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114624505929 0.0723426182421 158% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0434782608696 0.0435111971325 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0355731225296 0.0277247811725 128% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110671936759 0.128828473217 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0276679841897 0.0370669169778 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63459842799 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0276679841897 0.0208969081088 132% => OK
Particles: 0.0118577075099 0.00154638098197 767% => OK
Determiners: 0.0948616600791 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00790513833992 0.0158828679856 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00395256916996 0.0114777025283 34% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1511.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 236.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.40254237288 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.444915254237 0.374372842146 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.338983050847 0.287516216867 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203389830508 0.187439937562 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14406779661 0.113142543107 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63459842799 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546610169492 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 52.1088499264 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 29.5 21.7502111507 136% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7638281598 49.3711431718 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.875 132.220823453 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 21.7502111507 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 0.878197800319 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 63.3983050847 50.5018328374 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.59677419355 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366323569624 0.549887131256 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.185504654044 0.142949733639 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0958518985385 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.747209489638 0.631733273073 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146901382861 0.139662658121 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201689731373 0.266732575781 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849778533281 0.103435571967 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.333696561796 0.414875509568 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0073109401251 0.0530846634433 14% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259998080835 0.40443939384 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611304815352 0.0528353158467 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.