News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
The journalists filming and recording lots of material to be showed to people by TV or printed in newspapers. The most important factor that effects choosing of material is its own relevancy. News editors observe people’ interest and try to represent in the news the footage that will gather high number or viewers. For some reasons, the most popular sort of news is something terrible, shocking and frightening. For some reasons people mostly watching news about car accidents, homicides, hijacking and list goes on and on. In this essay I will discuss some problems, that caused this situation.
To begin with, for the last decade people have become more consumptive and materialistic. Everyone tries to have more expansive items, such as cellphones, PC tablets, home cinemas and other. People, especially youth, want to be better than their relatives and friends. This situation caused the negative outcome, particularly, people wishing bad to their buddies. They enjoy when something bad happened and that’s why bad news cause more interest than something good. To some extent, we get used to bad news. People see its very thrilling and eye-catching, rather than economical increasing in a country or simple building of a new educational facility, for example.
As more we become used to bad news, as much people become angrier and less kind and benevolent. To stop such tendency, the first thing we need is comprise more good and positive news in TV program and other sourced of mass media. However, it’s not enough just to show good news. To give a clear example, there is a war going in Ukraine. It’s almost impossible for reporters to show good news, as our native land was attacked by other nation… Hundreds of people dying every month. So in this case, governments should take all feasible measures to stop this conflict and then we will able to watch good news.
In conclusion, the huge amount of negative content in news caused by modern tendencies of life. To avoid this, reporters ought to pay more attention to good news and encourage folks to be more friendly, outgoing and be addicted to money.
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for poorer nations. However the governments of richer nations should take more resposibility for helping poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. 84
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 68
- There are different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 84
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... As more we become used to bad news, as much people become angrier and less kind and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'comprised'.
Suggestion: comprised
...ch tendency, the first thing we need is comprise more good and positive news in TV progr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly, outgoing and be addicted to money.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'sort of', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237980769231 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.146634615385 0.155533422707 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122596153846 0.0946595960268 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528846153846 0.0501214627716 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0336538461538 0.0437548338989 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0889423076923 0.122226691241 73% => OK
Participles: 0.0456730769231 0.0403226058552 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68275514419 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0504807692308 0.0326793684256 154% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0625 0.0861772015684 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0120192307692 0.021408717616 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00961538461538 0.011925033212 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2138.0 1933.35771543 111% => OK
No of words: 355.0 316.048096192 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02253521127 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36338028169 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267605633803 0.28420135186 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216901408451 0.203846283523 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129577464789 0.137316102897 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68275514419 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.037074148 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588732394366 0.56093040696 105% => OK
Word variations: 67.980315835 60.7387585426 112% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0891783567 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9047619048 20.7743622355 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9320812554 49.517814964 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.80952381 127.492653851 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.7743622355 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.47619047619 0.814263465372 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 43.665325285 49.1944974215 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.59793814433 1.69124875643 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370586865002 0.332605444948 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0749858925502 0.102741220458 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0543119923739 0.0668466124924 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.457097839608 0.534860350844 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.104870689327 0.148594505496 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140409080859 0.134430193775 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867626484143 0.0742795772207 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403125815219 0.324371583561 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0323338585074 0.0638462369009 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276613904967 0.228012699653 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576395226412 0.058150111329 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.