Do you agree or disagree? when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects
The question is whether when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects or not. Every one with consideration to his abilities can have different opinions about cons and pros of working in a group or alone with. With this in mind, I believe that being in a group is the most effective way for completing a project. My reasons and arguments are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that when a project is worked by a group, can broaden in a spread spectrum. Since a lot of people with different experiences gather in a group, their skills can meet group's needs. Students can bring their idea on a table and share them with each other. On the one hand students will be able to obtain a lot of worthwhile information, on the other one their project will confront with massive of creative ideas.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that being in the group can help students to improve their performance. Nobody could overlook this fact that a group creates a competition feeling among students. A mandatory force will push them to keep up themselves with the members of a group; hence they will try and look for the newest data more than every other time. Inasmuch being up-date plays a crucial role in this modern world, students will attempt for it.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by the fallowing discussion. One of the most noticeable supports for a group is that it can rise up interpersonal skills in students. When a large number of people set in a group, they will have a chance to connect with different people, so the students will make new friends for themselves. This issue will provide a bed for developing their personality.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into the consideration, the following conclusion would be drawn about this issue. A group will not only extend the positive ideas in a project, but also it can affect on other miscellaneous aspects as establishing a power communication among the members of that group.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-10-12 | peerless alex | 72 | view |
- do you agree or disagree?Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life, is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or alone? 88
- which one is better?Participating in the class and sharing idea or sitting and listening to the teacher and taking note? 76
- do you agree or disagree? the rules that the whole society today expect young people to follow are too strict. 85
- DO you agree or disagree If a student is having difficulty studying a course it is better for the student to turn to a friend who is good at this course than to turn to his teacher for help 90
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students hold 93
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the students much more effectively
the students are much more effectively
it is axiomatic that when a project is worked by a group, can broaden
it is axiomatic that when a project is worked by a group, it can broaden
A group will not only extend the positive ideas in a project, but also it can affect
Description: 'Not only...but also' is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
flaws:
There is a pattern behind the essay with pattern sentences. Examiners may figure them out and give lower marks.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 382 350
No. of Characters: 1764 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.421 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.618 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.619 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.621 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.278 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.504 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...the members of a group; hence they will try and look for the newest data more than ever...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... interpersonal skills in students. When a large number of people set in a group, they will have a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 200, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ive ideas in a project, but also it can affect on other miscellaneous aspects as establis...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230024213075 0.229887763892 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.138014527845 0.158761421928 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0726392251816 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0314769975787 0.046263068375 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0556900726392 0.0685040099705 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154963680387 0.118717715034 131% => OK
Participles: 0.0387409200969 0.0351676179071 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68443978045 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0193704600484 0.0309702414327 63% => OK
Particles: 0.00484261501211 0.00188951952338 256% => OK
Determiners: 0.125907990315 0.0887237588012 142% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0484261501211 0.0209618222197 231% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0169491525424 0.0139019557991 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2187.0 2387.08602151 92% => OK
No of words: 382.0 408.028673835 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72513089005 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.295811518325 0.338922669872 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212041884817 0.251872472559 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15445026178 0.174417080927 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0994764397906 0.112833075102 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68443978045 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526178010471 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 57.9712165336 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4705882353 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0832666253 48.84282405 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.647058824 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.644075263715 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 43.674776717 45.7405998639 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.88172043011 1.45489161554 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267065965548 0.300154397459 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107429086085 0.103427244359 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0450584131598 0.0752933317313 60% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.507130383333 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102765940918 0.151897553556 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104572370902 0.114077575197 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181474186068 0.0781384742642 232% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.348579766352 0.336927656856 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0727682539841 0.067059652881 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174647810269 0.210909579961 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141833444216 0.0618886996521 229% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.6433691756 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.