When it comes to news, people in general believe that it is enough for us that we should only care about things happening around us. On the other hand, quite a few people hold totally different points of views and they argue that people are supposed to know everything important happened on our planet. Even though things do not occur within our country, it is necessary for us to care about the whole world.
To begin with, it is true that we may not directly be influenced by things happening in other country. However, the world does not work due to the contribution of only one country. For example, if there is a huge fire burning the Amazon rain forests, and there is no related news spread out of the area. The fire burn for several days with only little efforts of local people to extinguish the fire. Then, we all know the obnoxious repercussion is that the fire exterminated many unique species, which are usually impossible to recover with the contributions of scientists. Nevertheless, if the news broadcast worldwide, people from other countries would dedicate themselves in attempts to put off the fire in order to prevent those precious and irreversible species becoming extinct. As a result, people are supposed to care about the whole world.
Moreover, keeping up with the trends also improve our own value, which will benefit not just society but also the planet. In addition, knowledge is power since the more we know about the world, the more adapt to this world we can be. With the gradual perspective of internationalism, people start to aware that they are competing with not just people of their own country, but those from other countries. Take China and India students for instance, they are known for their continuously diligent attitude toward studying. Hence, in my country, when I was young, my teachers and my parents always motivated me that I should work harder since if I did not, I would certainly be defeated by those hardworking students in India and China. Consequently, whenever I felt loose, my teachers’ and parents’ words emerged in my mind, and they actually worked as motivation to urge me to be more diligent.
Accordingly, people should not hesitate to know about events that happen around the world, even if they do not directly impact on our daily life.
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 70
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 73
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 60
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in general', 'as a result', 'it is true', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.195067264574 0.229887763892 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.154708520179 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0807174887892 0.0866891130778 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0784753363229 0.046263068375 170% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0807174887892 0.0685040099705 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134529147982 0.118717715034 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0313901345291 0.0351676179071 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68308331364 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0336322869955 0.0309702414327 109% => OK
Particles: 0.00448430493274 0.00188951952338 237% => OK
Determiners: 0.067264573991 0.0887237588012 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179372197309 0.0209618222197 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134529147982 0.0139019557991 97% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2311.0 2387.08602151 97% => OK
No of words: 395.0 408.028673835 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85063291139 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33164556962 0.338922669872 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225316455696 0.251872472559 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172151898734 0.174417080927 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101265822785 0.112833075102 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68308331364 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536708860759 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 60.3836405189 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 23.2352941176 20.5533526081 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0661038536 48.84282405 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.941176471 120.699889404 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.5533526081 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.23529411765 0.644075263715 192% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 45.7669396873 45.7405998639 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.15 1.45489161554 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335694265722 0.300154397459 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11377375157 0.103427244359 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0789162726268 0.0752933317313 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.512559300876 0.497263757937 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158464716679 0.151897553556 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136905644671 0.114077575197 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724776325123 0.0781384742642 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.331132437873 0.336927656856 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.088901435171 0.067059652881 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25068255262 0.210909579961 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498406948135 0.0618886996521 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.