do you agree or disagree?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
The question is whether technology has made children less creative than they were in the past or not. In existence of massive devices have been made in recent years, it can be said that spontaneously the effects of these inventions will be observed on children's life. In regard to this point, I believe that excessive use of technology harms to social and physical activity of children. My arguments and reasons are listed below that will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that technology plays a crucial role in modern life in a spread spectrum. The variety of the laptops, the smart phones and the tablets and so on, will be caused children to become less creative. I ponder that the advanced tools deprive children from thinking. To elucidate, when I was a kid because of absence the technology, me and my friends were curious about our surrounding. Flying was an incredible dream for us; hence our efforts were always toward discovering a way for taking off from ground, although those endeavors were unsuccessful, but our mind was in a fresh mood.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that the computers and other things related with them avoid children from society. It is an undeniable fact that being in community will improve children's interpersonal skills. Meeting a lot of people will provide an opportunity for children to make new friends and subsequently new groups. One of the most salient objectives of a group is that children with different backgrounds share their ideas with each other, consequently creative ideas can originate.
The final reason for this consent is that the technology increases numb and torpid feeling among children who are addicted to it. Nobody could overlook this fact that a healthy mind can act better than an idle mind. In this circumstance how we would expect to foster children with high quality. The main culprit of this story is our performance. If we do not allow them to use technology exceedingly, this problem will solve.
By taking all above mentioned reasons, the following conclusion could be drawn from this issue. On the one hand Technology provides a lethargy bed for children; on the other one it takes the chance of having a creative mind from them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
- which one is better?Participating in the class and sharing idea or sitting and listening to the teacher and taking note. 76
- a foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on that day? 70
- do you agree or disagree?visiting museum is the best way to get information about a country . 81
- do you prefer to give money for which type of activity:providing food and house for poor peoplegiving money to poor people for starting the small businessmedical care 90
- tpo44 60
Comments
Essay evaluation report
In existence of massive devices have been made in recent years,
Description: what is the subject for this sentence? can you re-write this sentence?
will be caused children to become less creative.
will cause children to become less creative.
although those endeavors were unsuccessful, but our mind was in a fresh mood.
Description: don't put 'although' 'but' in one sentence.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
are you sure 'on the other one' is used properly?
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 387 350
No. of Characters: 1849 1500
No. of Different Words: 217 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.435 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.778 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.623 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.368 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.05 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.368 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.298 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.298 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'in regard to', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232779097387 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.1567695962 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0902612826603 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0261282660333 0.046263068375 56% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0593824228029 0.0685040099705 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149643705463 0.118717715034 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0451306413302 0.0351676179071 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68234977221 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021377672209 0.0309702414327 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00237529691211 0.00188951952338 126% => OK
Determiners: 0.111638954869 0.0887237588012 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0285035629454 0.0209618222197 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00950118764846 0.0139019557991 68% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2274.0 2387.08602151 95% => OK
No of words: 387.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87596899225 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341085271318 0.338922669872 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.258397932817 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1834625323 0.174417080927 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116279069767 0.112833075102 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68234977221 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578811369509 0.524397521467 110% => OK
Word variations: 67.8665158691 59.2087087015 115% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3684210526 20.5533526081 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2012940628 48.84282405 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.684210526 120.699889404 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.5533526081 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.644075263715 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 46.2082143343 45.7405998639 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.76470588235 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284597803565 0.300154397459 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0763134355623 0.103427244359 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.051332642703 0.0752933317313 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48298534723 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113221475446 0.151897553556 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108101590593 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128277151131 0.0781384742642 164% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.310843588694 0.336927656856 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0549428063648 0.067059652881 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176720632442 0.210909579961 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690518616052 0.0618886996521 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.