Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or
In general, it is true that world today is much more complex than it was in the past. But this does not justify the claim made in the prompt. It is often the events of the past and its learnings that make way to decide and come up with new plausible solution. Everywhere people look for precedents to decide on taking big decision. Experiences in general help people to make prudent decision on big problems. In any case, political, social, or scientific; experience of an individual have huge impact on discerning judgments in any predicament.
In the aftermath of world's most harrowing industrial disaster, Bhopal Gas Tragedy in 1984, industrial stalwarts came together to introspect and learn from the findings to make stern safety rules so that such incident does not happen again in the future. This led to formation of Process Safety Management, which serves as guidebook in making processes safer for people as well as environment. Often in the times of political imbroglio, leaders seek truth and wisdom from ancient philosophies. Experiences of previous Presidents help in construing foreign policies of a nation. People try not to follow the same path which in past have backfired on them.
In scientific world, past experiences have always served a basis for the future experiments, and thus leading to breakthrough discoveries. For example, the structure of an atom was studied by several scientists, and each new discovery was based on the experiences and failures of the previous works to scientifically justify every aspect. Each flaw was religiously studied, and eventually the basic structure was proposed and accepted globally. Similarly, in the field of medical sciences, past medical conditions of patients serve an important criterion in decision of type of medications to be provided. Several people are allergic to sporadic things; their previous experiences help them in avoiding any further complications.
However, these precedents should be considered only when there is relevance in other aspects of life as well. Learnings from the past experiences should be collaborated in cognizant of the fact that world has changed in every sense i.e. economic, political, and social; countries are now more dependent on other. These factors should not be neglected in making important decisions. Things which were quite popular and collectively believed to be true do not hold the same sacrosanct status in current world.
Conclusively, it is always the past experiences which make people more prudent and discerning in their day-today decision making. But often things in the past do not carry the same relevancy in contemporary world, and decisions should be based on a balance between these two.
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 85
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...kfired on them. In scientific world, past experiences have always served a basis for the futu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...cts of life as well. Learnings from the past experiences should be collaborated in cognizant of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...orld. Conclusively, it is always the past experiences which make people more prudent and disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in general', 'as well as', 'in any case', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230769230769 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.158004158004 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122661122661 0.0880659088768 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0706860706861 0.0497285424764 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.018711018711 0.0444667217837 42% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135135135135 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.047817047817 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9230009356 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.024948024948 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.002079002079 0.0016655270985 125% => OK
Determiners: 0.0831600831601 0.0997080785238 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00831600831601 0.0249443105267 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010395010395 0.0148568991511 70% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2727.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 435.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26896551724 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393103448276 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310344827586 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234482758621 0.200843997647 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.183908045977 0.132149295362 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9230009356 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 63.7677874388 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9130434783 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5747815824 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.565217391 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.674092028746 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 49.9475262369 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.67226890756 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429754796598 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0866613583439 0.123202303941 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0920735385431 0.077325440228 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.482451802121 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124614201883 0.149214159877 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160807948296 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940778278104 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.389660408395 0.385218514788 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0502489610317 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306953214671 0.275328986314 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620451298754 0.0653680567796 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.