When a country develop its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the past fifty years, the development of technology has significantly changed our lifestyle. Some of people believed that the traditional skills and old ways of life should be definitely replaced by modern and professional skills, yet there still remains argument against this issue. Overall, it is my personal view that no matter how prosperous technology is, the loss of traditional skills and ways of life will adversely affect our life.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that human beings are not born like robots. Human society grows from a long history of civilization. Without traditional ways of life, our life would become much more momentous rather than a colorful and beautiful life. Thanks to diversity of culture and customs, it motivates people to travel around the world to discover and experience different ways of life. Moreover, once traditional ways of life die out, human beings’ morale will suffer. Take the case of respecting seniority in a family as a salient example. The children will not how to show respect to their grandparents, which consequently leave the old isolated and frustrated.
Even more importantly, though culture in general and traditional skills in particular facilitates the development of technology. The majority of inventions entails a great deal of time and efforts. It went through many times of trials and errors to be eventually successful. Thus, it is definitely disadvantageous if we are unable to inherit experience from previous generations. Were it not for traditional skills which laid the solid foundation, we would have to start from scratch. Therefore, the disappearance of traditional skills, particularly good skills may halt the progress of technology growth and make the technology cease to develop, otherwise the development of technology will take even longer period of time.
By ways of conclusion, I once again affirm my position that culture and traditional skills are vitally pivotal due to their positive impact on the prosperity of technology and human beings. In years to come, I strongly believe that education campaigns in terms of preservation and concern about culture and lifestyle should be adopted by majority of population to make the development of technology much more achievable.
- Academic / intellectual evaluations of the applicant. Personal / interpersonal evaluation: From the perspective of a teacher/professor, please comment on the personal aspects of the applicant other than his/her academic capabilities. This section may incl 80
- Some people believe that unpaid communityrity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- When a country develop its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Every year several languages die out every year. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier when there are fewer languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Social scientists and natural scientists are not always regarded as equal when it comes to financial compensation for the work they have done in their own fields of study. Some people feel that natural scientists, including medical doctors and geneticists 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Some of', you should use 'the' ('Some of the people') or simply say ''Some people''.
Suggestion: Some of the people; Some people
...as significantly changed our lifestyle. Some of people believed that the traditional skills an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 709, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ent of technology will take even longer period of time. By ways of conclusion, I once again ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, in general, in particular, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3379501385 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04558260303 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559556786704 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6741425665 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.055555556 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => More facts,knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185142500865 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547496599804 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556070928334 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113318577274 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355370235526 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.