TPO 40
In this set of material, the reading section mainly explains three theories to reject the living of human on the Mars or the Moon surface, while the listening section casts doubt on the information presented in the passages and gives several reasons to support his idea.
First of all, the passage posits that because of the extreme amount of pressure on their surface, living for human is impossible. In contrary, the professor claims that the pressure is not as high as the reading section mentions that would not be solved. This pressure on that planet is known physical phenomena. In fact, the level of the pressure on their surface is reasonable and normal. Thus, there is no danger for human beings living on them.
In addition, the speaker disagrees with the idea that there is not any source for getting water and oxygen on them. She believes that presence of carbon dioxid and sulfuric acid on their surface is the clue for existing of materials which lead to the water and oxygen. In other words, she adds that since water and oxygen are necessary for life of human, these materials are adequate and reasonable source for getting water from them, and there is no need for importing water from earth.
Finally, although the reading section states that thick clouds on the atmosphere of that plant could prevent the life there, the professor subscribes the view that the clouds on the Marc and the Moon are not as thick as make problem for tapering the sunlight. She argues that the amount of sunlight on the atmosphere is enough for living the human beings. She mentioned that utilizing of solar power plant would be a good idea for gathering the sunlight on the surface and the atmosphere, in a way, the plant power could reflect the sunlight toward below to the surface of Mars, before it would be reflected to the outside.
- TPO 25 3
- TPO 42Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO32 76
- TPO29Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31557228348 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465625 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7596010506 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265371992572 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101287046098 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392518819115 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150522752188 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503824447526 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.