TPO 02-Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Do you agree or disagree?
Members of a society are valued by their merits and virtues. Among these virtues, telling the truth has a prominent place. When it comes to relationship between our fellow citizens, no one could ever cast doubt on the fact that honesty is one of the most important considerations. But always telling the truth is another story and this is the point where the disagreement stops. Some hold the conviction that people must always be honest, no matter what. In sharp contrast to this view, there are critics who oppose this opinion, claiming that depending on the situation, it would be ok if some lies would be exchanged between people. As far as I am concerned, I think the latter carries more weight. In the following essay, I will try to explain two reasons which I believe are among the most common viewpoints these days.
The first point which is worth mentioning is that sometimes not telling the truth helps us to save our lives or should I say protect ourselves from likely dangers. It seems quite reasonable to be alert when we perceive hazard. Given the fact that the elderly and children are more fragile in comparison to other, it is surprisingly logical that the importance of ignoring one of the most significant factors in relations between members of a community, honesty, as I said above, is to be revealed more especially. As an illustration, my friend's grandmother is willing to tell lie about her loneliness when is being asked if she lives alone in her home. No need to mention that she might be afraid of being robbed or harmed in some way. This reason totally justifies her action. As a result, there might be occasions in which not telling the truth looks like a safety factor that contributes to being survived.
Another point needs to be made is that in some situations not being honest would be conceived to help others. How paradoxical that telling lies serve a positive function! For instance, just imagine you are a physician. To promote your patient's health and keep him confident, you need not to tell him about his diagnosis. Otherwise, he would lose his self-confidence which might lead to a worse condition that may even result in his termination. So, you consciously choose to not be honest with him in that you feel responsibility towards your patients.
In a nutshell, people, trapped in situations, occasionally perceive the need of not being honest and this necessity forces them to do so. I think that we can justify these situations. Life is so complicated so that we cannot assert a fact even regarded as a code of ethics is abstractly true. In other words, analyzing even moral values should be considered within a context.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the most common viewpoints these days. The first point which is worth mentionin...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tell'?
Suggestion: tell
...th and keep him confident, you need not to tell him about his diagnosis. Otherwise, he ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, for instance, i think, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78958785249 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7419719082 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555314533623 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7602479118 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154406914405 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418267622275 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424099143923 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090951198795 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499563924069 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.