TPO43
In this set of material, the article explains three main theories about how the agnosids which were a group of marine animals and became extinct, lived and ate, while the listening section casts doubt about the information presented in the listening and believes that these theories are not convincing enough.
First of all, the reading section states that the agnosids were free-swimming predators. In contrast, the constructor makes the point that it is probable they were on the open ocean. She describes why they are more likely to be open ocean swimming. In fact, she explains that predator needs to have large and well-developed eyes to catch the food under the ocean. On the other hand, agnostids not only did not have this kind of eyes, but also they were blind. This evidence dismisses this idea that they were predators.
In addition, the professor disagrees with the idea that angostids inhabited on the seafloor, and she implies that they had not the ability to swim swiftly. She mentions several examples to illustrate this hypothesis. She adds that there were many small creatures on the seafloor which swam fast, and since Agnostids swam slowly they were not able to catch them. Moreover, she highlights that they were multi-geographic dwellers and moved one area to other one.
Finally, although the passage posits that the agnosids were parasites, the talker specifies that there were not large population of agnostide, and there were certain limit about them. Specifically, she elaborates by saying that they killed out host organics. In addition, she cites the study about this to clear her idea. The fossil evidences rule out this idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56280972116 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7707804086 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307005541326 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100385058322 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672830701975 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178779513219 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576285600745 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.