The map shows the proposal of two prospective sites for building a new shopping mall in Brandfield.
There are some similarities of both proposed sites (S1 and S2). Both places are surrounded by the main road, the railway, and the city centre. Moreover, they are almost equally close from the golf course and park area on the west. However, there are some differences of both locations.
S1 is easily accessible from the housing estate nearby on the north side. Furthermore, there is a river on the east which can be worth a view. However, this site is too far from the industrial estate area on the south east.
On the other hand, S2 is very close from the industrial estate on the south side. However, the river view on the west is too far to be seen. Furthermore, the site is too far to be reached from the residential area.
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 67
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 72
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 56
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 687.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51326259847 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 12.6406140661 43.030603864 29% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.4545454545 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6363636364 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131255165564 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524270993596 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721273385084 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103238997445 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094114493229 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 13.2329268293 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 11.4140731707 76% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.