The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates how the population of elderly people (aged 65 years and over) encountered changes from 1940 and how it is predicted to change until 2040 in USA, Sweden, and Japan.
In the USA and Sweden as Western countries, they experienced similar elderly population trend. The number were ony just below 10% initially, rose by about 5% four decades later, and by 2040 they will be about 25%. However, the only difference between them is that while in the USA the population was stagnated from 1980 until 2010s, the population in Sweden increased instead at that period to approximately 20%.
In Japan, as an Asian country, the elderly population trend is completely different. From 1940, the number hovered at only 5% and below until 2000s; making this country as the one having the lowest number at that period compared to the formers. Surprisingly, at the middle of 2000s the number was steadily increasing and it is forecast that by 2030, the number will skyrocket to over 25% in 2040.
In summary, in between 1940 until 2010s, the USA and Sweden had the most aging population compared to Japan, however, it is predicted that Japan elerdly population will outmatch the USA and Sweden aging population 30 years later.
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 74
- The Drawbacks To The Use Of Nuclear Power Mean That It Is Not A Long Lasting Solution To The Problem Of Meeting Ever-increasing Energy Needs 70
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94230769231 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57878807369 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6969600708 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193381128766 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864341852895 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371983103042 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125976381858 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125516199974 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.