As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The 21st century is a distinctive era when technology is virtually ubiquitous. As presented in the issue, with people rely increasingly more on it, the inevitable deterioration of human’s ability to think for themselves. However, in thinking of the ways in which technology serves humans, it is safe to say technology has never prevented people from thinking; rather, it has promoted it.
As not all activities need thinking to be involved, the technology that aims to free humans from these activities will therefore not curtail people’s ability to think. For example, do you need to think in order to conduct simple actions such as walk and run? Certainly not. In the same vein, transport devices, invented to replace walking long distance, do not require people to think as they are merely a tool for you to save time. They are like human’s “super legs” and help people to walk faster while no need for much work from the brain. People have been increasingly relying on transport devices; yet, their ability of thinking for themselves has never been diminished on account of it.
Instead of weakening, technology has promoted people to think more actively. In any field, today’s competition is largely dependent on how technology is effectively used. To achieve this, one has to strive to keep up with the faster-than-ever changing and updating of the modern technology, which requires constantly integrate new technology into the field. This is a process of analyzing and manipulating different kinds of technology to serve one’s certain purposes, which undoubtedly needs people to think and subsequently enhance the ability of thinking.
On the other hand, as technology has provided the solutions to many problems, one will worry that people will just go with technology and not bother to think of any solutions by themselves. However, given the fact that problems in the real world is endless, though being freed from some of them, people still face many other problems that are not yet resolved by technology, to name a couple: AIDS and pollution. Modern technology helps us focus our attention and thinking on the problems waiting to be solved. Since there are always new ones, humans will never cease to think and therefore the ability of thinking will not deteriorate.
In conclusion, the use of technology has brought about both benefits and harmful effects. Nevertheless, it does not cause the ability of humans think for themselves to decline.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 43
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alig 61
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, 74
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 50
- The effectiveness of a country’s leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country’s citizens. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 85
Comments
Essay evaluation report
with people rely increasingly more on it, the inevitable deterioration of human’s ability to think for themselves.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
problems in the real world is endless,
problems in the real world are endless,
-------------
arguments: OK
-------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 403 //better to have 450 words
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 403 350
No. of Characters: 2002 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.48 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.968 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.739 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.211 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.853 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.474 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.539 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22084367246 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93540521217 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523573200993 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1304032918 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321711037567 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101615883348 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648247512853 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181323163944 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326809939764 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.