TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive,

The reading passage claims that one of the most common North Slope dinosaurs, the elephant-sized edmontosaurs, survived the winter by migrating south to more hospitable regions. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First, the reading passage asserts that due to lack of plants growing during frosty winter, edmotosaurs must leave the zone to find a new zone with adequate food, so they migrated. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that edmontosaurs did not have to migrate to find food during the winter. She asserts that on million years ago summer days were warmer than today, and the sun shone 24 hours a day. Therefore, warm temperature and extensive daylight made incredibly conditions to plant producing, so food was plentiful. After that, when winter came, the planets became dead, and edmotosaurs could eat dead plants in the winters.
Furthermore, the author argues that esmonotsaurs lived in the herd, and this kind of living supports the migration hypothesis, because it made migration easier. Moreover, it is confirmed by modern-day migratory animals. On the contrary, the speaker holds the view that living in the herd does not mean they migrated. She claims that living in the herd has other advantages such as extra protection from predators. Also, she provides an example to refute the generalizations of author. For example, resorvelt elks live in the herd, but they do not migrate.
Finally, the reading passage underlines the fact that edmonosaurs were physically capable of migrating long distances. In contrast, the professor dismisses this issue due to fact that juvenile edmonisaurs were not capable of traveling a long-distance way which is required to reach a warm zone for their weakness features. In addition, edomonosaurs could not leave their offspring not far behind because they would not be survived.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27631578947 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80917200762 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5424160602 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336256092637 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925289248248 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816907368981 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17070625741 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321546149211 0.0443174109184 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.