Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In order to help small businesses surivive in the market, I agree with the claim that government should play a minimal role in private business matters. There can be a number of ways in which small businesses can be helped like providing loans at a very less interest rate, etc, which could be possible if they could focus more on the small businesses. Government giving less importance to private business matters might give them more time to address the issues of smaller businesses.
Any product catches the attention of the buyers mostly by advertising. Therefore government helping small businesses advertise their product might help them to thrive in the market. Moreover they can also help them with money in the form of loans with cheap interest rates.
Private businesses with excessive funding gathers a lot of consumers by offering several attractive offers. One such example is the recent introduction of Ola; a startup which offers cab rides at a lesser price compared to the auto rickshaws. This resulted in the decline of usage of the auto rickshaws. This problem can be solved by the government by providing auto drivers with bonuses in order to compensate for the reduced price of auto rides. Also this reduced price must reach the customers (for them to be aware of this lower price), which is possible in the form of advertisement in the newpapers. Whereas these private businesses, in this case Ola is self sufficient.
Therefore government playing minimal role in private business could help devote more time and effort in smaller businesses and therby helping them thrive in the market.
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. Indeveloping and supporting your position, b 50
- The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' Internet use from thei 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...on of the buyers mostly by advertising. Therefore government helping small businesses adv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ight help them to thrive in the market. Moreover they can also help them with money in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...te for the reduced price of auto rides. Also this reduced price must reach the custo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... in this case Ola is self sufficient. Therefore government playing minimal role in priv...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03745318352 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6222792347 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4770371018 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313097399748 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116737292162 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137955495017 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20811960394 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970601330042 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.