Some people believe that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The humans are the sophisticated creation, and they are learned how to behave each other. These learning activities are some continual processes which spanned to all of their lives. To be a good member of a society, some people believe that parents should learn their children, but others think schools are responsible for this. This essay will discuss both sides of this belief.

It is believed by some that children should acquire their social skills by means of their parents' teaching. An idea that supports this manner of thinking is related to the nature of humans. The humans start to learn from primitive months of their lives and their characteristics are formed before school age. Thus, it is blatantly obvious that why some people gravitate towards this point of view.

On the other hand, many argue that the schools are responsible for this. For instance, the schools for the sake of having some governmental supports such as financial aids, expertise employees and so on, are the specialized foundations for the children upbringing. Therefore, it is crystal clear why many back this claim.

For reason related to the learning process in humans, and this underlying issue which is declared children are learned from the cradle is supported and refuted by many. For as much as children's traits are formed school age, it can be inferred from the points of views, parents have a lot of responsibilities about their children and should attempt to fulfill this purpose.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-12-29 justine62 56 view
Essays by user justine62 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun back seems to be countable; consider using: 'many backs'.
Suggestion: many backs
...ing. Therefore, it is crystal clear why many back this claim. For reason related to th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0693877551 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61780657936 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563265306122 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.007026113 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5384615385 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32099465482 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119576157474 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10608588252 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205957564841 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114006350358 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.