Over the last few years, many schools have included foreign language in their curriculum. Indeed, these types of schools have increased markedly especially in developed countries like U.K., USA and so on. However, it is argued by some people that foreign language should be started at primary school instead of beginning at secondary school. I completely agree with this idea. In this essay, I will support my idea with relevant examples.
Undoubtedly, primary school is the best place to embark teaching foreign language. Children are usually receptive and flexible to alien language. Moreover, learning can be made interesting and attractive by the use of toys. Over and above that, they tend to imitate and produce same types of pronounciations without any inhibitions and self-consciousness of their older ones. Also, they are free to study pristine language without any pressures.
Secondly, children tend to gain self confidence. For instance, telling story in front of the audience in foreign language. Not only they would be motivated to learn more but also it broadens their horizon. That is to say, they get excellent opportunities to be familiar with different cultures. For this reason, they tend to have bright future career abroad as most employers are generally impressed by those employees who are acquainted with different languages and cultures.
On the other hand, studying foreign language at secondary school can be ineffective and inefficient. To put it in another way, students during this time are generally very busy in academic subjects like physics, chemistry and maths. Which is why they tend to give less priorities to foreign language and moreover they are under huge pressure from teachers and parents to get distinction in their native subjects. In addition, they tend to be very anxious, nervous and embarrassed readily on minor mistakes.
In a nut shell, primary school is ideal for learning foreign language than in the secondary due to vital factors like extreme sensitivity and open nature of children.
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 90
- Money spent on exploration of space is a complete waste, it could be spend more effectively on improvements of living of people. To what extent do u agree disagree 85
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow, societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization. Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity.To what extent 90
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are actually important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 76
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common disease or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?You should use your own 88
Dear sir, I would like to
Dear sir, I would like to comment you on my weaknesses so that I can correct myself on those weaknesses. Thank you.
1. Don't repeat words,
1. Don't repeat words, phrases and sentences. like: 'they tend to...' repeated 4-5 times.
2. Use relative clauses and adverb clauses to make the sentence length longer.
3. Don't use pronouns as the subject of sentences, like: 'they', 'I'
----------------
other than that, you did a great job! Your overall score should be around 7.5 out of 9
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture career abroad as most employers are generally impressed by those employees w...
^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun priorities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d maths. Which is why they tend to give less priorities to foreign language and more...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81492892487 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1702205353 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360325372548 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101738659614 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142313396006 0.0667982634062 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219449767887 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12542259084 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.