Needless to say, many characters contribute to one being successful in the job market, including knowledge, skills and the ability to relate to people. I believe that studying hard in school is far more important than the ability to deal with people well.
First of all, today's world is in the knowledge economy, where knowledge and skills are unprecedentedly important, and sufficient education provides people with essential skills and knowledge they need. For instance, researchers and doctors are required to know a lot about their field and study at universities for a long time before they can commence their career, and economists are expected to understand math. Studying hard at school gives people more knowledge and makes them more capable in a particular job and thus more competitive when seeking a job. Employers always favor those who can bring more benefits to their companies.
Second, through the course of study, one can develop a set of learning methods that suits themselves and cultivate the habit of studying. This makes them a life-long learner. People work for several decades in their life, during which everything is changing. New technology comes into offices from time to time, and the world is also changing and developing fast. So having the ability and habit of learning throughout life makes them be able to catch up with changes and improve. These employees are definitely more valuable and welcomed than those who can simply deal with people well.
Nonetheless, no one works alone. During career, people need to meet others, to negotiate with customers, to deal with competitors on a daily basis. So the ability to relate to people is undeniable important. Instead of requiring people to develop these abilities at school, I would argue that this is what can be learned after they actually get a job. After having sufficient knowledge and skills to get a job, people can gradually know how to get along with different people through work, which can make them more welcomed and successful in job.
In conclusion, as knowledge and skills play a more and more critical role in job market today, studying hard at school would make one more capable and competitive in a future job. In addition, people can learn how to relate well to people during their work, which makes them more successful in job.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 79
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 76
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03865979381 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60995192054 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487113402062 0.524837075471 93% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.671665934 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.894736842 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25015658967 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902114289569 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833402101716 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180068614605 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704756202293 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.