Topic 1: In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the present living conditions becomes increasingly unfavorable, making it difficult to sustain humans' life on the Earth. While I accept that it is vital to tackle this issue, I believe that allocating money on exploring other alien planets such as Mars to populate should be given a low priority.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why life on the Earth becomes more and more unsustainable. One primary reason is the over-exploitation of finite natural resources, which are gradually depleted. For example, the massive expenditure on fossil fuels such as coal, oil or gas to generate electricity adversely affects the environment and therefore these resources will soon be exhausted. Additionally, contaminated environment has caused a great concern today. In Viet Nam, for instance, millions of rubbish are dumped into the river by industrial factors every year, killing aquatic life and poisoning drinking water.
However, I would argue that searching for other planets to reside in is a tremendous waste of resources. Firstly, a huge amount of money is required to carry out this project, which put a heavy strain on state budget. These financial sources should be spent on raising living standard and providing good education and healthcare services for citizens in the country. Furthermore, it is advisable that money should be contributed on developing environmentally-friendly technologies, which reduces our over-reliance on fossil fuels and protects our environment from being seriously polluted.
In conclusion, it seems ludicrous to suggest spending money on researching other planets like Mars to settle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | hana99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | vantran2297 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Meet2607 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | Evelyn_Han | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...populate should be given a low priority. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uatic life and poisoning drinking water. However, I would argue that searching fo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironment from being seriously polluted. In conclusion, it seems ludicrous to sug...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ching other planets like Mars to settle.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62948207171 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36100585766 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653386454183 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.0734045377 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2222222222 7.06120827912 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26388499409 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850929940272 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738425895516 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150063293776 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036687271417 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.