TPO 18
The reading passage claims that there are some considerable ways to address the decline of Torreya. However, the lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She believes that none of these strategies are convincing and practical.
On the first place, the lecturer argues that it is not successful solution to recover Torreya because this land has a specific microclimate which affected by larger region also, global warming cause increasing in temperature, thus wet lands become dry. This, however, is contradicted to the reading passage mentions that reestablishing Terroya in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years. Northern Florida's microclimate is very favorable to Torreya's growth.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that by relocating Torreya to an entirely different location, far from Florida microclimate, thus human would simply be helping Torreya return to an environment. In contrast, she clearly contends that one time people decided to relocate one kind of tree to another location, by this advance this tree spread quickly on that area despite killing other plants and trees which native on that place, hence dangers of human's assistance outnumber its benefits.
Finally, the speaker points out that there are not the large population of trees which can survive from disease due they do not have enough capacity to keep these trees for long a time. Nonetheless, the text asserts that preserve Torreya in research centers, therefore scientists can closely monitor an environment.
- TPO 49 3
- tpo 49 3
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Althoughsome of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology hasbeen positive.What are your opinions on this? 84
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41935483871 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83893877375 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637096774194 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3397539393 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41346121299 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155612029292 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115700830383 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217300958795 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074783964455 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.