The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
The diagram illustrates the evolution of the horse from Eohippus to a modern horse with a particular stress on a foot structure, in 40 million years period.
As is observed from the picture, the first horse is known as an Eohippus, had a small body and snout. It had five tiny toes that were separate from each other. Then, it transformed into an ancestor of a today's horse - Mesohippus. After 10 million years, the body of the horse had enlarged along with a tail, a snout as well as the middle toe.
Again after an interval of 15 years, the Mesohippus evolved into Merichippus. The thighs in the latter had developed with a mane on a neck. In addition, middle toe became even larger while the two two basidigital toes reduced. Over time, Merichippus developed into a well-known Modern horse which had reduced metacarpals and a developed hoof along with a long tail and various joints.
All in all, a horse went through a plenty of changes before the contemporary horse.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-25 | gwagwa0271 | 61 | view |
- Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.What are your opinions on this? 93
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last ten years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 61
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 11
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 84
- As water is a valuable resource, governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: two
...middle toe became even larger while the two two basidigital toes reduced. Over time, Me...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75438596491 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66319053564 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2153474336 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245116820409 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856185601603 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820991635959 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145309127572 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086922444692 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.