Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Evolution and technological advancement have come a long way in ensuring that man lives a life of convenience. Whereas man started out by scavenging for food, nowadays, food preparation is much faster and easier. This is definitely as a result of many modern inventions we have come to associate with every household’s kitchen: the fridge, microwave, cooker and oven, among others.
Modern kitchen appliances allow us to prepare and store food effortlessly, with a mere click of a button or turn of a toggle. The fridge makes provision for the preservation of food items by cooling or freezing, making them last longer. The microwave is then used to defrost or warm up already stored food items in just a few seconds. Where the fridge and microwave are for freezing and defrosting, the cooker and oven are for cooking with heat. Nowadays, many electric ovens and pressure cookers render the average cooking time only a few minutes long. This reduces the amount of physical effort required to start a fire and labour intensively over the preparation of a meal.
Apart from kitchen appliances, the considerable ease with which food is prepared nowadays can be attributed to the type of food itself. With so many people lacking adequate cooking skills, a variety of already semi-prepared, packaged and frozen meals are available in stores. Perhaps the most famous of them is the Indomie instant noodles. One only needs to buy a packet, place it in the microwave for a few minutes and sit down to enjoy an instant meal. For those that prefer to cook their own meals, however, having cooking ingredients already washed, cut up, or blended increases convenience. For instance, many people prefer to buy frozen chicken parts, assorted vegetables, tomato paste, or canned mushrooms to use in cooking, thereby making cooking easier and faster.
In conclusion, despite the inarguable advantages of easy to use kitchen appliances and pre-packaged foodstuff, there is a grave drawback as to how human health has been affected. Where on one hand, humans are more relaxed and have more time for their daily activities; an exposure to modified food items has resulted in the genetic modification of human biology. Therefore, certain diseases like cancer will only be on the increase unless considerable effort is put into controlling the amount of pre-packaged, modified or microwaveable food we consume on a daily basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | eppa akhil | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Hakodate | 73 | view |
| 2017-05-02 | Karam Dhillon | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-07 | Yeesher | 84 | view |
| 2015-06-08 | itachi92 | 50 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, whereas, apart from, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13417721519 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87245732012 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577215189873 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2510536245 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120139271307 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385318252923 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353470786261 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775293465181 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032403772138 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.