The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph below illustrates the proportion of foreign visitors who visited four varieties of attractions in Brighton, England between 1980 and 2010. Overall what stands out from the graph is that pavilion and festival were the most popular, whereas art gallery and pier were the least popular among them.
Looking at the details, in 1980, the pavilion stood at 23% when the proportion increased rapidly over the next 15 years to hit peak at around 48% making it the highest percentage compared to other three temptations. Nevertheless, the rate dropped rapidly to just over 30% for the remaining period. Starting at 21% in 1980, art gallery followed the same trend as the pavilion. Although it saw a sharp increase in the next five years to 38%, the total numbers declined significantly to just 10% in 2010.
In contrast, appealings such as festival and pier followed opposite movements. Beginning the period at 30% festival represented the biggest proportion in 1980 among all other charming. However, there was steady drop in the number of sight seers to finish at around 28% by the end of 2012. Whereas at 10%, pier recorded by the lowest number of vacationists at the start of the period which was followed by some fluctuations and finally ending at just over 20% at the end of period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-27 | sherin rijo | 84 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 76
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 70
- Children should never be educated at home by their parents Do you agree or disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 77
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 85
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems.Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 84
Comments
Dear sir, could you please
Dear sir, could you please comment on my weaknesses? Thank you sir.
Essay evaluation report
No serious flaws found.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 220 200
No. of Characters: 1043 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.851 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.741 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.601 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 59 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.509 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.573 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the proportion of for...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92272727273 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63170042129 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586363636364 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2213154291 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142764803325 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550502126699 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754714389703 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105599089492 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609335447925 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.