The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the rates of unemployed women in four countries of the UK namely England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in the years 2013 and 2014.
It is clear that there were fewer women who did not hold a job in 2014 than in the previous year, except for those in Scotland. It is also noted that the unemployment rates of English women and Scottish women were considerably higher than those of women in Wales and Northern Ireland.
In 2013, the percentage of women without work in England was highest, with 6.8 %, compared to only 6.1 % of women who were out of work in Scotland. The level of women who were unemployed in Northern Ireland was higher than the figure for those in Wales, at 5.6% and 5.4 % respectively.
In 2014, while the rates of jobless women in England and in Wales dropped slightly by 0.3% and 0.4 % respectively, the figure for those in Northern Ireland fell significantly by 1% to 4.6 %. By contrast, 2014 saw a steady rise in the female unemployment rate in Scotland, reaching a peak at 6.7 %.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | Naveen chowdary | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | maya123 | 67 | view |
| 2018-03-30 | bechir sekrafi | 61 | view |
| 2018-03-08 | staroongirl | 56 | view |
| 2017-12-09 | sherin rijo | 73 | view |
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 80
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64480874317 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58697155467 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.794666971 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107120047161 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671540333287 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498012653951 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884183443336 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489868337881 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.