The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total
supply in 2000, 2004 and 2007.
The bar chart compares the percentage of the energy resources which can be renewed with the entire supply in four different regions in three seperate year. Overall, the level of renewable energy in Norway and Germany raised during this period while this in the other nations fluctuated.
Norway was the country where had the highest proportion of sustainable energy among four countries, with about 61%, 65% and 78% in 2003, 2004 and 2007 respectively. The amount of this kind of energy increased slightly from abut 12% in 2000 to 18% in 2007.
Unlike Norway and Germany, the other areas had the most renewable energy in 2004 which accounted for nearly 60% and 10% in Iceland and Australia properly. In Iceland, this figure went up from more 50% in 2000 to nearly 60% in 2004, then it decreased to 55% in 2007. The amount of renewable energy also fluctuated around 9% in three years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-14 | mr.cuong95 | 61 | view |
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- In some countries more and more people are buying imported food rather than buying food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What can be done to encourage people to buy locally produced food 90
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- 8.Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Agree or disagree. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81699346405 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41120669457 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8329103188 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27893483975 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125187676654 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307957353966 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184994087721 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518394735687 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.