The figure illustrates how much fish, lamb, beef and chicken was consumed by an European country during the period of 1979 to 2004.
As can be seen, at the beginning of the period, beef was by far the most popular type of meat, starting at 220 grams per person per week. After which were lamb, chicken and fish at 150, 140 and 60, respectively.
During this period, although facing a soar in a small duration from 1981 to 1982, beef’s consumption experienced a downward trend just like that of lamb, each of which reaching 100 and 70 grams by the year 2004. The consumption of fish, however, remained almost steady at 50 grams.
Despite other types of meat, the amount of chicken consumed was significantly increased to 250 grams by the end of the period, taking over lamb and beef in 1980 and 1988, respectively.
Overall, it seems that chicken has taken the place of beef in this period and became the most used type of meet in this European country by 2004.
- Some people believe that children should listen to and obey their parents. Others believe that children should think and do things on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 85
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 61
- Large Shopping Malls Are Replacing Small Shops. Your Opinion? Good Or Bad 77
- do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... lamb, beef and chicken was consumed by an European country during the period of 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66473988439 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45963096621 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6670547398 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330571492595 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164991570114 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15172921045 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20882617592 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155986861632 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.