In the modern era, the people most of day time spends in the work and evening time give to family and friends this is regular activity. However, some of the people want to finish the work in three to four days after remaining days of the week spend with family. From my vantage point, I disagree to the idea that it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. I choose my stance because of work for shorter hours is more benefits than longer hours.
To begin with, work for long hour is negative impact on human body. Long time working means stress to the body and people feel tired. Constant work is increase the chance of sick, depression by work load, lack of sleep and mentally disturbance. Full day work is extremely harmed to our body and people cannot take rest. On the other hand, the short time and five days work is maintain healthier body. Gradually work is not only help to active physically but also mentally healthier.
Furthermore, quality of the work is also noticeable reasons. Full day worker is tired fast than half day worker because of full day worker not active give concentration the work as result, harm to the company productivity and quality of the work. However, the person who work shorter hour is more actively work because they have chance to complete their work other days.
Moreover, many people assume that three day working help to give more time to their family and friends but its chance to decrease the interest to the work after short vacation. People not easily adjust and some time crucial things they forgive causes harm to their job. In contrast, the shorter hours work people are more active and also they have chance to time spend with family. They daily gives time for their kids and family members.
In brief, contemplating aforementioned reason, work for more days and shorten hours is take more active in the both physically and mentally besides, increase the company productivity and quality of work of the employees. Therefore, I strongly disagree that three day and longer hour gives more enjoyment than five day and shorten hours work.
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 78
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 75
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 80
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ends this is regular activity. However, some of the people want to finish the work in three...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, therefore, in brief, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66838046272 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26481504692 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413881748072 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9633250731 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5789473684 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438907304566 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155189701004 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149045782742 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277172461711 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152565771234 0.0645574589148 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.