A public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products.
Testing new products on animal such as lab rats and guinea pigs has been a widely recognised methodology by pharmacists and scientists in order to ensure that they are suitable for human usage. However, some claim that this practice is inhumane and violates animal cruelty. In my opinion, animal experimenter is righteous and brings more benefits than harms.
The first point is that human stands at the top of food chain in the current world. The law of nature, originated from Darwin's evolution theory, has been retained since the beginning of time: "survival of the fittest" meaning that natural selection happens where the strong prey on the weaker to ensure survival. It is only natural that we humans have the right to utilise small animals to obtain a better mean of survival. In addition, the experiments are done on a small amount of animal which obviously will not endanger the entire species.
The second point is to guarantee safety of human being. If the product is not tested, it is logically impossible to see all the potential effects on human. Besides, untested products are not allowed to be circulated in the market as they are deemed unsafe for consumption. Unknown effects of products can even cause outbreak of serious issues such as epidemic or large scale contamination. It can be argued that lives of small animals far outweigh the consequences of these disasters.
Lastly, some might dispute that there are alternated methods for testing which do not involve animal lives. Obviously, all lives are equal thus there would be no need for sacrificing animals if there are more effective ways of testing. Unfortunately, there is currently no better way. Computer simulation, with the most advanced technology, is by far the best substitute which can be used to predict the effects of drugs. However, human bodies are complex and contain a great number of unknowns which can be allergic to components of drugs. There have been many scientifically explainable cases of reactions of human body to drugs. Animal testing is an extra step needed to be done for safety reason.
In conclusion, I definitely support the methodology of animal testing for new products. It is the most ethical, effective and reliable way to prevent unknown events caused by brand-new products on public safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-21 | ganuongtoi | 76 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost Technology and tradition are incompatible You cannot have both together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 77
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experiences, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 79
- A public safety is of the highest importance it is often necessary to test new products on animals It is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products 76
- A government s role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure roads water supplies etc All other services education health social security etc should be provided by private groups or individuals in the country To what extent do you ag 70
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. You cannot have both together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 76
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No flaws found.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 382 350
No. of Characters: 1881 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.421 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.924 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.61 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.19 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.652 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.619 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.267 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.062 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09162303665 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76480071038 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.929051402 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.619047619 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301314223737 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859545404516 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640081831318 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164904319117 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489480345066 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.