In the highly-developing world, it’s not uncommon that people strive for efficiency and profits. But in recent years, people's quest for correctness and quality has also arisen. So, whether to work quickly and risk making mistakes or to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct is perplexing. As for my concerns, I deeply believe slowing down and assuring the accuracy counts more.
With global economy stepping onto a high-speed track, working quickly sometimes brings mortal mistakes and losses, which could ruin the whole industry. Take Samsung for example, after its release of Note 7, explosion accidents happened widely around the world; hence, Samsung had to withdraw all the Note 7 products, eternally halt production and apologize to the public. What’s more, the company has lost their consumers’ trust due to their ignorance in safety examination in excessive pursuit of the lightness and thinness of cellphones. The fact is the blind aspiration of efficiency is not the insurance of a company's interests, instead, potential risks will always exist when speeding up and always, risks await triggering. So it is wise not to work too fast and undertake huge risks.
Noticeably, however, slow-work creates masterpieces. When it comes to film making, a first-class movie always requires long-time polish, from the script to performance, from scenario settings to post production. Just like the movie Boyhood, it took the director twelve years to film it so that everybody got the opportunity to vividly experience the fleeting time in his movie. And eventually, he harvested double-wins in reputation and box office. So the fact revealed speed is not the only path to success, instead, slow but delicate work could reach both quality and profits.
Furthermore, working slowly to assure correctness is of vital importance to many jobs. For instance, food supervisors have to work carefully to examine the safety of food so that consumers will not be harmed or even lose their lives. Never should railway inspectors work too quickly because once they commit a mistake, trains might derail and passengers' lives will not be guaranteed. Likewise, without finance accountants’ precise work on finance, the serious impact might plunge the whole company into chaos. So even though today’s people emphasize speed and efficiency than ever before, those who work on ordinary posts require time to accomplish their tasks well. In reality, it is their slow but accurate work that attaches significance to what they pursue-- safety and order.
Profits may take the first place in the modern money-worshiping world, but nobody could eliminate risks which fast speed brings. On the contrary, slow-work not only creates wonders but is critically significant to many jobs in society. That’s why I believe it is more important to work slowly and make everything is correct.
- For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of our 66
- TPO24- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO21 – Independent: A/D? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 97
- TPO22 – Independent: A/D? Teachers should not make their political or social views known to students in classroom. 76
- "For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of ou 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, may, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36681222707 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8860730798 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602620087336 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1838625646 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.869565217 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378293313721 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106965691905 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145055105672 0.0737576698707 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217716663749 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115843187757 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.