A job should be a job for life. Agree or disagree?
One of the most important life decisions of a person’s life is finding and choosing a career that suits both your capacities and needs. When the time to get a job comes, some people will argue that a job should mean a job for life, but is that really so? In the following paragraphs I will try to illustrate the positive aspects of both having a job for a life and changing a job every couple of years. Afterwards, I will give my opinion on the subject.
To begin with, the positive aspects of working on the same job for a lifetime are many, one of them is being able to construct your career on the same field. In this case people could start in the lower position and then climb to the highest as years go by. Another positive aspect could be getting to know your coworkers really well, and thus, creating strong relationships. Moreover, if people is good at what they do, they could also get recognized as the best of their area. Furthermore, they would surely acquire a deeper knowledge of their job field.
Contrary to the above, by jumping from one job to another every two or three years, people could expand their experiences over the different fields of their careers. They could also get the constant stimuli of the novelty, which helps the brain remain creative and rejuvenated. Finally, if a company should ever shut down, a person having a broader knowledge over different fields would have it easier to find another job than a person who always worked on the same field.
Lastly, to ilustrate the positive aspects of having a job for a life I’ll give with my father’s example: my father, who works in the insurance field, has maintained the same job over the last 26 years. He is known for being good at what he does, and people trust him. Furthermore, he is what people would call “an expert on his field” and they would ask for his advice when they need it. Above all, he is happy and comfortable in his job. Conversely, I could give the example of my uncle, he is a Systems Engineer. He finds stimulating to learn different things every couple of years. Consequently, always try to work for the same company or in the same position for no more than two or three years. Even though he does not spend enough time in a company to get promoted, his previous experiences allow him to get high work positions every time he feels the need for a change.
To conclude, I find the idea of not staying on the same job for an extended period more attractive. I personally need the thrill of the novelty and get bored by doing the same over and over. . Furthermore, I also believe that at the current time, is more important to be able to do many things. Nothing is granted, not even the security of a life lasting job. Therefore, I do not believe that only having the experience of one field would be in advantage in case of needing to change a job.
- A job should be a job for life. Agree or disagree? 70
- Lecture + Reading passage regarding altruistic behaviors 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 79
- Population density 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... bored by doing the same over and over. . Furthermore, I also believe that at the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51238095238 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51497919621 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457142857143 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7691477586 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.76 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308852263578 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984751545641 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10413496469 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203870435763 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101294231523 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.